Skip to main content

Security report for enovate.no

Enovate AS · Technology · Norway

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enovate AS is a Norwegian technology company specializing in cloud-based digital solutions for test planning, course management, and e-learning. Founded in 2004, the company offers user-friendly platforms tailored to organizational needs, targeting primarily educational institutions and businesses requiring competence documentation. Their market position is supported by a portfolio of domestic and international clients, as evidenced by showcased customer logos and testimonials. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and SEO plugins, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO readiness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of explicit security policies and incident response information suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is adequate with clear privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy business with a strong digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enovate.no

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
73
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enovate AS operates a B2B SaaS model focusing on digital learning and testing solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in customizable, cloud-based platforms that streamline test and course administration. The company targets organizations needing efficient digital training tools, including government agencies and private sector clients. Their growth is indicated by a diverse client base and active social media engagement. The business ecosystem includes partnerships with clients in education and public sectors, though no explicit partner domains were identified. Revenue streams likely derive from software subscriptions and support services. Strategic observations suggest continued investment in digital marketing and platform enhancements to maintain market relevance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks published security policies, incident response plans, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for compliance and trust. The use of up-to-date WordPress and plugins reduces vulnerability risks, but the presence of an unconfigured Google Analytics plugin could pose privacy concerns. No security headers were detected, indicating an opportunity to enhance defense-in-depth. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but would benefit from formalized policies and improved transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Configure analytics tools properly to ensure privacy compliance and data accuracy.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party plugins and update them promptly.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enovate AS
Description
Planlegg og administrer, gi opplæring med e-læring og lag tester som dokumenterer ferdigheter og kompetanse med Enovates brukervennlige, skybaserte løsninger.
Key services
Test planning and administration, Course management, E-learning content delivery, Competence documentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.3.5, Elementor 3.27.7, Elementor Pro 3.27.7, All in One SEO plugin, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.0, Swiper.js
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Norwegian with some English metadata.
  3. No explicit terms of service page found.
  4. Contact phone number is clearly labeled and consistent with company contact.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, LinkedIn, and TikTok.
  6. No exposed emails in HTML content; contact likely via form or phone.
  7. SEO is well implemented with multiple meta tags and structured data.
  8. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  9. Google Analytics plugin present but not configured.
  10. Website uses modern WordPress and Elementor technologies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.3.5 with Elementor and Elementor Pro page builders, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries like Swiper.js and jQuery 3.7.0. SEO is enhanced via All in One SEO and Yoast plugins, with comprehensive meta tags and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading and responsive design implemented. The site uses Google Fonts for typography and includes social media integration. No hosting provider details were found. Technical risks are minimal but include potential plugin vulnerabilities and unconfigured analytics. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers for a more robust technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enovate.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enovate.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.