Skip to main content

Security report for enom.com

Tucows · Technology · Canada

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enom is a well-established domain reseller platform owned by Tucows, offering a white-label solution for domains, email, and SSL certificates. The company targets website builders, hosting providers, and technology companies, providing flexible integration options including APIs and control panels. The website demonstrates strong branding, professional design, and comprehensive content that supports its market position as an industry leader with over 20 years of experience and millions of domains registered. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern analytics and marketing tools integrated, ensuring good SEO, accessibility, and mobile responsiveness. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and security best practices observed, although explicit security headers could be confirmed. WHOIS data is unavailable likely due to registry restrictions, but the association with Tucows and consistent branding supports legitimacy. Overall, Enom presents a trustworthy and professional platform with a mature digital infrastructure.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of enom.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enom.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enom operates in the domain registration and reseller market, leveraging its parent company Tucows' infrastructure. Its business model focuses on providing a white-label reseller platform with competitive pricing and flexible integration, appealing to a broad range of customers including website builders, hosting companies, and technology firms. The company benefits from a large reseller base and extensive domain portfolio, positioning it as a key player in the domain services industry. Partnerships with major providers like DigiCert enhance its SSL offerings. The website's marketing and testimonial content reinforce trust and customer satisfaction. Enom's ecosystem includes related domains like hover.com for direct domain registration and tucowsdomains.com as the parent entity, indicating a well-integrated service network.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and uses security plugins to protect against common WordPress vulnerabilities such as user enumeration. While some security headers are not explicitly confirmed, the overall security posture is good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Incident response contact is available via an abuse policy page, indicating readiness to handle security incidents. However, the absence of a dedicated security policy page and vulnerability disclosure mechanism like security.txt suggests room for improvement in transparency and formal security communication. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR considerations. The site uses multiple analytics and tracking tools, balanced with privacy mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file.
  3. Verify and explicitly set security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency on data retention policies related to analytics and user data.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Tucows
Description
Enom provides a white-label reseller platform for domains, email, and SSL certificates, enabling businesses to offer these services with competitive pricing and flexible integration.
Key services
Domain registration and reseller services, SSL certificates, Hosted email services, API and control panel integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Gauges analytics, Zendesk, Jetpack
Frameworks
React (deferred scripts)
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with CSRF protection implied by WordPress plugins
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., stop-user-enumeration)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar, Jetpack Stats, Gauges
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Gauges, Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Jetpack, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional reseller platform for domains, email, and SSL certificates.
  2. Strong branding and consistent messaging aligned with Tucows.
  3. Comprehensive service offerings with API and integration support.
  4. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
  5. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or restricted, which is common for large registrars or privacy-protected domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including React for frontend components and integrations with HubSpot, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Jetpack for analytics and marketing. The site demonstrates good SEO optimization using Yoast SEO and is mobile responsive with accessibility features. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses secure HTTPS connections and employs security plugins to protect against common CMS vulnerabilities. Technical debt appears low with up-to-date libraries and structured data implemented for SEO. Opportunities exist to improve security header implementation and formalize security and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 71/100 +3Medium32 findingsView report
  2. 68/100Medium32 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.