Skip to main content

Security report for enlyft.com

Enlyft · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enlyft is a technology company specializing in AI-powered B2B customer acquisition and account intelligence solutions. Their platform leverages proprietary data and AI models to help sales, marketing, and partner teams prioritize accounts and accelerate go-to-market strategies. The company is positioned as a trusted partner to major technology firms and their ecosystems, offering services such as custom propensity modeling, data enrichment, and partner activation. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear messaging, and strong trust signals including customer testimonials and partner logos. Technically, the website is built on Webflow CMS and integrates multiple modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Bing Ads. Hosting and DNS services are provided via Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with comprehensive SEO and privacy compliance measures including cookie consent mechanisms and detailed privacy and terms policies. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong domain registration protections but lacks publicly disclosed security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The domain registration data is consistent with the business profile, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by enabling DNSSEC and publishing a security.txt file. The overall risk assessment is low with no critical issues identified. Strategic recommendations include improving DNS security, formalizing security policies, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts. The website and business demonstrate a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance suitable for their market segment.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enlyft.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enlyft operates in the technology sector providing AI-driven B2B sales and marketing intelligence solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in proprietary data assets and AI-powered propensity models tailored to customer ICPs and partner ecosystems. Revenue streams likely include subscription SaaS plans and custom data services. The target customers are medium to large enterprises focused on account-based marketing and partner activation. Growth indicators include partnerships with major tech companies and positive customer testimonials. The company maintains a strong partner ecosystem with Microsoft, Pax8, CDW, Dell, PwC, SHI, and Crayon. Strategic observations highlight a focus on data enrichment, integration with popular CRM platforms, and AI-driven insights to differentiate in a competitive market.

Security posture

The security maturity level of Enlyft's website is good. HTTPS is enforced with domain registration locked against unauthorized changes. The site uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts with cookie consent management, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No exposed credentials or vulnerabilities were found. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy policy and cookie banner. The company should consider publishing a security.txt file and enabling DNSSEC to enhance DNS security. Overall, the security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized incident response disclosures and continuous third-party script audits.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance form security by fully implementing reCAPTCHA or equivalent bot protection.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enlyft
Description
Enlyft provides AI-powered B2B customer acquisition and account intelligence platform that helps prioritize accounts and accelerate go-to-market efficiency using signals, scoring, and custom propensity modeling.
Key services
Account-Based Marketing, Sales Intelligence, Custom Data Enrichment, ICP and Propensity Models, Account or Contact Lists, Partner Activation
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, Cloudflare DNS, Basin Forms, Privado cookie consent, jQuery, WebFont Loader, Bing Ads, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Reddit Pixel, G2 Crowd tracking
Frameworks
Webflow
Platforms
Cloudflare, Google Cloud (implied by Google services)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status flags
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 (commented but present)
  • Cookie consent banner with management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Bing Ads, Reddit Pixel, G2 Crowd Attribution
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Bing Ads, Reddit Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, G2 Crowd Attribution
Marketing tools
Google Optimize, Privado cookie consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Strong presence of trust indicators including customer testimonials and partner logos.
  3. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Extensive use of third-party analytics and marketing tools with good privacy compliance.
  5. No security policy or incident response contact information publicly available.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
  7. Domain registration and WHOIS data support legitimacy of the business.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow CMS platform, leveraging modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Optimize, and various marketing pixels. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with good accessibility and SEO practices. The use of asynchronous script loading and font optimization contributes to fast load times. Technical debt appears low with no broken elements detected. Opportunities exist to further modernize security configurations such as enabling DNSSEC and formalizing security disclosures. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a robust and scalable digital presence aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enlyft.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enlyft.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.