Skip to main content

Security report for enjarai.dev

Technology · Netherlands

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website enjarai.dev is a personal site belonging to Evelyn, a Dutch computer science student and Minecraft mod developer. The site serves as a hub for sharing personal interests, mod projects, and community links. It targets Minecraft modders and programming enthusiasts with a focus on hobbyist content and personal blogging. The business model is primarily personal branding and community engagement through mod development and content sharing. The site is small-scale and niche, with a moderate market position within the Minecraft modding community. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with lightweight analytics via Plausible and a tracking script from trans.fish. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use, with basic accessibility and SEO features. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is hosted on an unknown provider and does not exhibit advanced technical infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks security headers and formal security policies. There are no forms or user input fields, reducing attack surface, but also no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Tracking is minimal and transparent. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices. The overall risk is low given the personal and non-commercial nature of the site, but improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and contact transparency are recommended to enhance trust and security culture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enjarai.dev

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enjarai.dev operates as a personal brand and community platform for a Minecraft mod developer and programming hobbyist. The site leverages popular mod hosting platforms like Modrinth and Curseforge, and integrates social media links to GitHub and Discord, indicating a community-focused approach. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on content sharing and mod distribution. The target audience includes Minecraft players interested in mods, programming enthusiasts, and followers of the author's personal projects. The site shows active engagement with mod updates and community links, suggesting growth potential within its niche. There are no formal partnerships or subsidiaries detected. The site’s ecosystem is primarily self-contained with external links to related hobbyist and developer platforms.

Security posture

The security maturity of enjarai.dev is basic. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There are no visible forms or input fields, reducing risk of injection attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting readiness for handling security incidents. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Tracking is minimal and uses privacy-respecting tools. Overall, the site is low risk but would benefit from implementing standard security best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user transparency.
  3. Provide clear contact information including a security or abuse contact email to improve incident response readiness.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and inclusivity.
  5. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of Evelyn (enjarai), a Dutch computer science student and programmer who creates Minecraft mods and shares personal interests including books and games.
Key services
Minecraft mod development, Personal blogging, Community links and social engagement
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Plausible Analytics, Periscope Trans.fish tracking script
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No forms detected to collect user input

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
periscope.trans.fish, plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal site focused on Minecraft modding and programming interests.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No forms present on the site; minimal data collection.
  5. Uses minimal tracking with plausible analytics and a tracking script from trans.fish.
  6. Good content quality with active mod updates and social links.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  8. No evidence of business certifications or formal security policies.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without reliance on heavy frameworks or CMS platforms. It uses Plausible Analytics for lightweight user tracking and a tracking script from trans.fish. The site loads moderately fast with basic mobile responsiveness and accessibility. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries. The site could improve SEO by adding meta description tags and structured data. Hosting details are not disclosed. The site’s technical implementation is solid for a personal site but could be enhanced with modern security headers and improved privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enjarai.dev. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enjarai.dev.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.