Skip to main content

Security report for enikofox.com

Eniko does bad things to code · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eniko Fox's website is a personal blog centered on software development, game development, and technology hobby projects. The site serves as a platform to share technical articles, promote indie games, and engage with a technology-savvy audience. The business model is primarily content-driven with monetization through donation platforms such as Ko-fi and Patreon. The site maintains a niche presence with a consistent brand and active social media engagement across Mastodon, Bluesky, YouTube, GitHub, and Twitch. Technically, the website is built using the Publii static site CMS, leveraging modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, and libraries like Prism.js and DOMPurify for code highlighting and security. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and use of sanitization libraries, but lacks important security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional for a personal blog but could improve in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enikofox.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets technology enthusiasts and indie game fans, leveraging a personal brand to share development insights and promote games hosted on a partner domain (kitsunegames.com). Revenue streams include donations via Ko-fi and Patreon. The site benefits from a strong social media ecosystem, enhancing reach and community engagement. The business operates at a small scale with no corporate structure or formal business registrations evident. The content strategy focuses on technical depth and personal storytelling, positioning the site as a credible source within its niche. Partnerships appear limited to game hosting and social platforms. Growth indicators include recent blog posts and increasing social media followers. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to formalize privacy and security practices to enhance credibility and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and the use of DOMPurify indicates awareness of XSS risks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a personal blog but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file and contact information for vulnerability reporting to facilitate responsible disclosure and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information on the website to improve business credibility and user support.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eniko does bad things to code
Description
Personal blog of Eniko Fox focusing on software development, game development, and technology hobby projects.
Key services
Personal blog content, Game development and promotion, Social media engagement, Donation platforms (Ko-fi, Patreon)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS, JavaScript, Publii CMS, Prism.js, DOMPurify, Font Awesome
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of DOMPurify for sanitizing potentially unsafe HTML content

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog focused on software and game development.
  2. No privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service found.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. Social media presence is strong with multiple verified platforms linked.
  5. Uses Publii CMS, a static site generator, enhancing security and performance.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Security headers are missing; HTTPS is enforced.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information available.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a static site generated by Publii CMS, which inherently reduces attack surface and improves performance. It uses modern front-end technologies including Prism.js for syntax highlighting and DOMPurify for sanitizing HTML content, indicating good security hygiene in content rendering. The site loads quickly and is mobile-optimized, with responsive design and clear navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). However, the absence of security headers and formal privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in compliance and security governance. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but the use of CDN-hosted libraries (cdnjs.cloudflare.com) indicates reliance on reputable third-party services. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a personal blog but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enikofox.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enikofox.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.