Skip to main content

Security report for encrypt.one

FINAL LEVEL · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Encrypt.One is a specialized online service offering client-side AES 256 encryption for secure text and file sharing. The platform targets users seeking privacy and security in sharing sensitive information by encrypting data within the browser before transmission, ensuring the server only stores encrypted content. The business is positioned as a niche technology provider with a small but focused market presence, backed by the parent company FINAL LEVEL. The service emphasizes transparency through open source code availability on Github and clear explanations of its encryption methodology. Technically, the website employs a modern tech stack including CryptoJS for encryption and jQuery for UI interactions, hosted via GoDaddy infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and functional design.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching encrypt.one

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, specifically in secure communications and encryption services. Its business model revolves around providing a free or low-barrier online tool for secure sharing, potentially monetized through sponsorships or related services. The presence of multiple sponsor links indicates a partnership ecosystem supporting the platform. The domain age and registration details align with the company's founding date, suggesting operational maturity. However, the lack of publicly available contact information and privacy policies may limit trust and compliance with data protection regulations. The open source nature and transparency about encryption practices are competitive advantages in the security-conscious market segment.

Security posture

Encrypt.One demonstrates a solid security foundation by implementing client-side AES 256 encryption, ensuring sensitive data is never transmitted in plaintext. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and explicit privacy or incident response policies represent gaps in the security posture. The domain uses privacy protection, which is justified given the nature of the service. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The service would benefit from enhanced security headers, DNSSEC implementation, and published security policies to improve trust and compliance, especially under GDPR and similar regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear incident response and security contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and trust.
  5. Consider adding cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance statements to align with privacy regulations.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FINAL LEVEL
Description
Encrypt One is an online encrypted text and secure file sharing service that uses browser-based AES 256 encryption to allow users to securely share secret files or passwords.
Key services
AES 256 encryption in browser, Secure encrypted text sharing, Secure encrypted file sharing (up to 5MB), Random password and passphrase generation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AES 256 encryption (CryptoJS), jQuery, W3.CSS framework
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Client-side AES 256 encryption before upload
  • No plaintext data sent to server
  • Encrypted data stored on server only
  • Passphrase not sent to server

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides client-side AES 256 encryption for secure sharing.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed.
  4. Open source code available on Github increases transparency.
  5. No visible security headers or DNSSEC enabled.
  6. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  7. Website is mobile optimized and has good UX design.
  8. Domain is privacy protected but legitimate and aged.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a lightweight and modern technology stack with CryptoJS for AES encryption and jQuery for UI functionality, styled with W3.CSS. The site is mobile responsive and well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO. Hosting appears to be via GoDaddy with domain privacy protection enabled. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts or trackers detected. However, the lack of CMS or advanced frameworks suggests limited scalability. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers indicates technical debt in security hardening. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could be improved with enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with encrypt.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review encrypt.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.