Skip to main content

Security report for encolajs.com

EncolaJS & Contributors · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EncolaJS Enforma is a specialized technology solution offering a comprehensive form-building framework for VueJS applications. It targets frontend developers seeking flexible, schema-driven, and reactive form solutions integrated with popular validation libraries and UI frameworks. The business operates as an open-source project with community engagement via GitHub and social media, positioning itself as a niche player in the VueJS ecosystem. Technically, the website leverages modern technologies such as VueJS, VitePress, TailwindCSS, and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Mailerlite and Google Tag Manager. Hosting and DNS services are provided by Cloudflare, ensuring good performance and security at the infrastructure level. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections, but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies, which should be addressed to meet GDPR and other regulations. Overall, the site is professional, well-structured, and safe for general audiences, but could improve in compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching encolajs.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company behind EncolaJS Enforma appears to be a small technology entity focused on developer tools for VueJS. Its business model centers on open-source software distribution with documentation and community contributions. The market positioning is niche, targeting frontend developers needing advanced form handling capabilities. Key competitive advantages include flexible validation options, schema-driven design, and UI framework integrations. Revenue streams are not explicit but may include consulting, support, or related services. The partnership ecosystem includes related EncolaJS projects and integrations. Growth indicators include active GitHub presence and ongoing feature announcements. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding compliance documentation and enhancing security features to build trust and enterprise adoption.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer lock enabled. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a missed opportunity to secure DNS queries. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are absent, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the business to regulatory risks. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden the website.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance contact information availability by adding direct support or security contact emails.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EncolaJS & Contributors
Description
Enforma - Complete form solution for VueJS apps. Craft VueJS forms that just work. Design everything from basic to complex, reactive forms using components or schema definitions. Use your favorite validation library (Zod, Yup, Valibot, @encolajs/validator) and UI kit (PrimeVue, Vuetify, Quasar).
Key services
Form building components, Schema-driven form definitions, Validation library integrations, UI framework integrations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
VueJS, VitePress, TailwindCSS, Mailerlite, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
VueJS, VitePress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Mailerlite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a technical documentation and product site for a VueJS form solution
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact available only via subscription form, no direct emails or phone numbers
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies and good performance optimizations
  5. No explicit security headers detected, DNSSEC not enabled
  6. No signs of malicious or adult content
  7. Domain registration is recent but consistent with business claims
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern frontend stack including VueJS and VitePress, styled with TailwindCSS, ensuring a responsive and performant user experience. Hosting via Cloudflare provides CDN and DNS resilience. The site uses Mailerlite for marketing forms and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a mature digital marketing setup. Performance is fast with preloading and module preloading techniques. Accessibility and SEO are well considered with proper meta tags and ARIA attributes. However, the absence of a CMS suggests content updates rely on static site generation and developer intervention. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC, which could be addressed to reduce attack surface and improve trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with encolajs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review encolajs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.