Skip to main content

Security report for enabl.fr

enabl · Technology · France

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

enabl is a French-based No Code and AI agency located in Nantes, targeting small and medium enterprises (TPE and PME). Founded in 2020, it operates as a hub and agency under the parent company Digital Korner. The company focuses on accelerating digital project delivery by leveraging No Code technologies and AI, offering services such as audit and consulting, production and deployment, and training and support. Their market position emphasizes rapid, cost-effective digital transformation solutions for SMEs. Technically, the website is built using modern front-end technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Typed.js, and AOS for animations. It is hosted by Infomaniak Network SA and uses the Dorik CMS platform. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Analytics are implemented via Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics, indicating moderate user tracking. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with excellent SSL configuration and employs basic anti-spam measures in its contact form. However, it lacks security headers and published security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is limited to a web form, with no direct emails or phone numbers provided. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with good content quality and technical implementation. The main risks relate to privacy compliance gaps and missing security best practices. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance the site's security posture and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enabl.fr

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

enabl operates in the technology sector as a specialized agency providing No Code and AI digital solutions primarily to small and medium enterprises in Nantes, France. Its business model centers on service delivery with a focus on rapid project turnaround and cost efficiency. The company leverages partnerships, notably with its parent company Digital Korner, to enhance its market reach and service offerings. The presence of client logos and clear service descriptions indicate a growing client base and trust signals. Revenue streams likely derive from consulting, development, and training services. The company targets SMEs seeking to digitize and automate processes quickly without heavy coding investments. Growth indicators include a modern web presence and integration of trending technologies like AI and No Code platforms.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam honeypot fields in forms. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, which limits transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is incomplete, with no cookie consent mechanism and limited GDPR indicators. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of reputable hosting and registrar adds trust, but improvements in security best practices and compliance documentation are recommended to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Provide direct contact information such as company email and phone number to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
enabl
Description
enabl est une agence No code & IA à Nantes qui réalise vos projets numériques plus vite et moins cher. Elle aide les TPE et PME à construire des outils numériques rapidement et intelligemment, notamment via des solutions No Code et IA.
Key services
Audit & Conseil, Production & Déploiement, Formation & Suivi
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Typed.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of honeypot field in contact form to prevent spam

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in French targeting small and medium enterprises in Nantes, France.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners found, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  4. Contact is only via form; no direct email or phone number found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern front-end libraries and good mobile optimization.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and popular libraries like jQuery, Typed.js, and AOS for animations. It uses the Dorik CMS platform and is hosted by Infomaniak Network SA, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO meta tags implemented. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a standard approach to user tracking. There is no evidence of heavy technical debt or outdated technologies. Opportunities exist to enhance accessibility features and implement security headers to improve overall technical robustness and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enabl.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enabl.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.