Skip to main content

Security report for emergencytechshow.com

Nineteen Group · Technology · United Kingdom

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Emergency Tech Show 2025 website serves as a professional platform showcasing technology innovation for emergency services in the UK. It targets emergency services professionals, government officials, and industry stakeholders, offering event registration, exhibitor information, and content programming. The site is well-branded and co-located with the established Emergency Services Show, indicating a strong market position within the emergency services event sector. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools, including HubSpot, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, reflecting a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented; however, the absence of explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable concern, potentially indicating recent registration or privacy protection, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emergencytechshow.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website represents an event organized by Nineteen Group, a known entity in the emergency services event space. The business model revolves around hosting large-scale technology exhibitions and conferences, connecting technology providers with emergency services professionals. The event attracts over 8,000 attendees and 150+ exhibitors, positioning it as a key industry gathering in the UK. The partnership with the Emergency Services Show and the use of a professional event platform enhance credibility. Revenue streams likely include exhibitor fees, sponsorships, and attendee registrations. The target market includes emergency services, government agencies, and technology vendors focused on digital transformation and innovation. The company leverages multiple digital marketing channels and analytics to optimize engagement and growth. Strategic observations include the need to solidify domain legitimacy and improve direct contact availability to enhance business credibility.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and a cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential gaps in defense-in-depth. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a published vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Incident response contact information is not provided, limiting transparency in security incident handling. Overall, while the site is secure for general use, adopting additional security best practices and improving transparency would strengthen its security posture and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nineteen Group
Description
The new home of technology innovation for the emergency services. Stay ahead of the curve and elevate your expertise by immersing yourself in the latest breakthroughs and innovations that are revolutionising the UK's emergency response.
Key services
Event hosting, Exhibitor showcasing, Networking platform, Content programme and stages
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, scriptjs 2.5.7, GSAP, Alpine.js, Slick Slider, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Frameworks
SHOWOFF by ASP.events
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot Marketing
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event platform for emergency services technology innovation.
  2. Content is rich with event details, exhibitor info, and registration calls to action.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found on the main pages.
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  5. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts are used.
  6. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Alpine.js, GSAP, and Slick Slider for UI interactions and animations. It integrates HubSpot for marketing automation and analytics, alongside Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for comprehensive tracking. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with a clear navigation structure and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts. The absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary event platform (SHOWOFF by ASP.events). Hosting provider details are not explicit. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional event website with room for optimization in performance and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emergencytechshow.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emergencytechshow.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.