Skip to main content

Security report for embl.org

European Molecular Biology Laboratory · Education · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL) is a prestigious intergovernmental research organization headquartered in Heidelberg, Germany, with multiple sites across Europe. Founded in 1974, EMBL focuses on fundamental molecular biology research, scientific services, training, and fostering collaboration across member states. The organization serves a broad audience including scientists, researchers, students, and industry partners, positioning itself as a leading European life sciences laboratory with global impact. Technically, the EMBL website is well-constructed using modern web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and Alpine.js. It employs CDNs for efficient content delivery and integrates Google Analytics for user behavior insights. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, demonstrating compliance with privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, explicit security headers and published security policies or incident response information are absent, representing areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, EMBL's website reflects a high level of professionalism, trustworthiness, and compliance, supporting its reputation as a leading scientific institution. The lack of WHOIS data due to privacy protection is consistent with the organization's profile and does not detract from its legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching embl.org

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention embl.org, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6
Employees
0
Customers
6
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for embl.org.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EMBL operates as a non-profit intergovernmental organization supported by 29 member states, providing cutting-edge research and scientific services in molecular biology. Its business model revolves around research excellence, training programs, and industry collaborations. The organization benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem, including EMBL-EBI and other European research entities. EMBL's market position is robust, with a large scale of operations and multiple European sites. The website content and job postings indicate ongoing growth and investment in talent acquisition. EMBL's strategic focus on innovation, education, and open science positions it well for continued leadership in life sciences research.

Security posture

EMBL's website demonstrates a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure. The absence of explicit security headers and published security or incident response policies suggests room for enhancement in transparency and defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, which could improve community engagement on security matters. Overall, the security maturity is good for an academic/research institution, but adopting additional best practices would strengthen resilience and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible to users and partners.
  3. Create and maintain a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance transparency around data retention and privacy practices beyond the existing privacy policy.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
European Molecular Biology Laboratory
Description
With 29 member states, laboratories at six locations across Europe and thousands of scientists and engineers working together, the European Molecular Biology Laboratory is a powerhouse of biological expertise. The intergovernmental organisation, headquartered in Heidelberg, was founded in 1974 with the mission of promoting molecular biology research in Europe, training young scientists, and developing new technologies.
Key services
Fundamental molecular biology research, Scientific services and facilities, Training and education, Conferences and courses, Industry relations
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Alpine.js, Google Analytics, Cloudimg.io (image CDN), Polyfill.io
Frameworks
Alpine.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to malformed request or privacy protection.
  3. Strong presence of scientific and educational content.
  4. Multiple European sites and offices listed with physical addresses and phone numbers.
  5. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  6. No forms detected on homepage; contact likely via email or contact page.
  7. Social media presence on major platforms with official accounts.
  8. Use of modern JavaScript library Alpine.js and CDN for assets.
  9. Google Analytics implemented for user tracking.
  10. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
Technical notes

Notes

The EMBL website is built on a modern, performant tech stack including Alpine.js for reactive UI components, CDN-hosted assets for fast delivery, and Google Analytics for traffic analysis. The site is mobile-responsive and accessible, with well-structured metadata and SEO optimizations. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site loads quickly and provides a rich user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive content. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and formalize security-related documentation to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with embl.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review embl.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.