Skip to main content

Security report for emarketdesign.com

eMarket Design · Technology · United States

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eMarket Design is a small technology company specializing in enterprise software solutions for WordPress. Established in 2006, it offers scalable, secure, and customizable WordPress plugins and software tailored to business needs. The company positions itself as a provider of high-quality, user-friendly enterprise WordPress solutions with a growing customer base. Technically, the website is built using the Hugo static site generator, leveraging modern web technologies such as FontAwesome and Google Fonts, and is hosted with domain registration via Amazon Registrar and DNS through Cloudflare. The site is fast, mobile-optimized, and well-structured with good SEO practices. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and domain status locks, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms hosted on a related domain but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emarketdesign.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets enterprise WordPress users needing robust and scalable software solutions. Its business model focuses on delivering high-quality plugins and software with automated testing and continuous refinement. The presence of customer testimonials and related partner domains indicates an established ecosystem. The company leverages partnerships with emdplugins.com and wpappstudio.com to extend its product and support offerings. The domain age and registration details support a credible and stable business presence. Revenue streams likely include software sales and support services. Growth indicators include a growing community and continuous product development.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status locks to prevent unauthorized changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC is a minor security gap. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, and no incident response contact information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and handling of security issues. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism despite use of Google Analytics may present privacy compliance risks under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with formal policies and enhanced DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and inform users about tracking.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Consider listing contact emails or phone numbers explicitly on the website to improve user trust and support accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eMarket Design
Description
eMarket Design offers easy-to-use, beautiful, and powerful enterprise software solutions for WordPress. Their software solutions scale with business growth, integrate with existing systems, provide strong security, customization, user-friendly interfaces, reliable performance, and advanced analytics.
Key services
Enterprise WordPress plugins, Customizable software solutions, Support and maintenance services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo static site generator, FontAwesome, Cloudflare DNS, Google Fonts, Swiper.js slider
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Fonts, FontAwesome
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused on enterprise WordPress solutions.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the main site.
  4. Privacy and terms policies are hosted on a related domain (emdplugins.com).
  5. No visible forms collecting user data on the homepage.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and good mobile optimization.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  8. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of analytics.
  9. Customer testimonials provide trust signals.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Hugo static site generator, which provides fast performance and security benefits by serving static content. It uses modern front-end libraries such as FontAwesome for icons and Swiper.js for sliders. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive images and fonts loaded from Google Fonts. Hosting and DNS are managed via reputable providers (Amazon Registrar and Cloudflare). The site includes proper meta tags for SEO and social sharing (Open Graph and Twitter cards). No CMS or dynamic backend was detected, reducing attack surface. Performance is fast with lazy loading and deferred CSS. No broken links or errors were found. The technical stack is modern and well-implemented, supporting a good user experience and operational stability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emarketdesign.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emarketdesign.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.