Skip to main content

Security report for emailmeform.com

EmailMeForm · Technology · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

75/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EmailMeForm is a technology company providing secure online form and survey solutions that enable businesses to collect payments, customer data, registrations, event RSVPs, and leads. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image targeting businesses and organizations seeking customizable online forms. The technical infrastructure leverages modern JavaScript libraries and third-party services such as Intercom, Google Tag Manager, and CookieHub, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy policy documentation. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, though the website content and technology usage suggest legitimate operations. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences and demonstrates good design and user experience.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emailmeform.com

This scan found 11 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
Average
83
After the cap
75

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates a SaaS business model focused on online form creation and data collection services. It targets a broad market of businesses needing secure and customizable forms for payments, registrations, and lead generation. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates an active effort to optimize user engagement and conversion. However, the lack of publicly available business registration or contact information may limit trust for some users. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and a clear value proposition in the competitive online form market.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting compliance with basic security and privacy standards. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting. The use of reputable third-party services is a positive indicator, but the lack of WHOIS transparency and missing privacy policy are notable gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be improved with enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response and data protection officer contacts.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to enhance domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EmailMeForm
Description
Collect payments, customer data, registrations, event RSVPs, and leads with our secure online forms and surveys – use powerful templates or DIY. Sign up free.
Key services
Online form creation, Payment collection, Customer data collection, Event registrations, Lead generation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Modernizr, Visual Website Optimizer, Intercom, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of secure third-party scripts
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Inspectlet, Google Tag Manager, Visual Website Optimizer
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Inspectlet, Visual Website Optimizer
Marketing tools
Intercom, CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual for an active business website.
  3. Privacy policy and terms of service pages not found or not linked in the analyzed content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieHub.
  5. Multiple third-party analytics and marketing scripts are used.
  6. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided content.
  7. Website uses HTTPS and modern JavaScript libraries.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is business-focused and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including jQuery, Modernizr, and third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Inspectlet, Google Tag Manager, and Visual Website Optimizer. The site is mobile-optimized and uses cookie consent scripts to comply with privacy regulations. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. The site lacks some accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional SaaS offering but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emailmeform.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emailmeform.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.