Skip to main content

Security report for elyza.app

Elyza · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elyza is a niche AI chatbot platform specializing in uncensored NSFW AI companions, offering users the ability to chat, send photos, and voice notes with AI characters. The business model is subscription-based with additional features such as character creation and an affiliate program. The website targets adult users interested in AI companionship with a focus on unfiltered interactions. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript frameworks (likely React), is hosted on Cloudflare Pages, and integrates multiple analytics and advertising tools including Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude, Reddit, and Twitter pixels. The site is mobile-optimized with good design and navigation, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking explicit security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. The domain uses privacy-protected WHOIS, which is common for this business type. Overall, Elyza presents a professional and functional platform with room for improvement in security and privacy transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elyza.app

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elyza operates in the technology sector, focusing on AI-driven adult chat companions. Its competitive advantage lies in offering uncensored, NSFW AI characters with multimedia messaging capabilities. The subscription model and affiliate program suggest diversified revenue streams. The target market is adult users seeking personalized AI interactions. The company appears small and focused, with no public parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership with Partnero indicates an affiliate marketing ecosystem. The use of multiple ad networks and tracking pixels reflects an active marketing strategy. The lack of explicit contact information and security policies may impact trust and compliance perceptions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a critical security baseline. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The extensive use of third-party analytics and advertising scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and GDPR compliance indicators suggests potential compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance.
  5. Provide clear contact information to improve business credibility and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elyza
Description
The best unfiltered AI character experience. Meet your AI soulmate. She's just waiting for you to talk naughty with her.
Key services
AI chat companions, Character creation, Messaging with photos and voice notes
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (inferred from main.js and CSS naming), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude Analytics, Reddit Ads Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Partnero affiliate script, Cloudflare Pages hosting
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Cloudflare Pages
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Reddit Ads, Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Amplitude, Reddit Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Marketing tools
Amplitude Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website offers AI chat companions with NSFW content
  2. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on main page
  3. Privacy policy present but cookie consent missing
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and advertising scripts present
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  6. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected
  7. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks and analytics tools
  8. No WAF or blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based frontend with optimized CSS and JavaScript bundles. Hosting on Cloudflare Pages provides reliable performance and security benefits. Integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. However, the lack of visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. There is an opportunity to improve SEO and accessibility features to enhance user experience and search engine rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elyza.app. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elyza.app.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.