Skip to main content

Security report for elva.lv

Elva · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elva is a Latvian-based technology company specializing in providing strategic IT partnership services focused on ERP and CRM systems. The company positions itself as a business enabler by offering smarter IT solutions that enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS and modern e-commerce and analytics integrations. The company appears to target business clients seeking ERP and CRM solutions, emphasizing strategic partnership and technology expertise. Technically, the website employs a solid infrastructure with HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital footprint. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and consent management, though explicit security policies and incident response information are absent, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with basic privacy standards, though WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elva.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elva operates in the technology sector, focusing on ERP and CRM software solutions for businesses. Their business model is B2B, providing IT consulting and software implementation services. The company leverages partnerships with major technology providers such as Microsoft and integrates e-commerce and payment platforms like Ecwid and Stripe, indicating a diversified service offering. The website content and structured data suggest a company founded around 2021, with a medium-sized operational scale. The presence of multiple marketing and analytics tools reflects an active approach to customer engagement and market analysis. The lack of explicit contact details on the homepage may indicate a controlled lead generation approach. The company’s market position as a strategic IT partner is supported by branding consistency and trust signals such as Microsoft partnership. The ecosystem includes key partners for e-commerce and payment processing, enhancing service delivery capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with enforced HTTPS and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy and GDPR compliance. The use of Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel is managed via consent, indicating privacy-aware tracking. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security hardening. No explicit security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, which are important for transparency and trust in the IT services sector. The WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding a security.txt file to improve incident response readiness and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a detailed privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the homepage to improve transparency and compliance.
  3. Add explicit security policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elva
Description
Mēs palīdzam atrast gudrākus risinājumus, kas ļaus Tavam biznesam kļūt efektīvākam, strādājot ātrāk un ar mazākām izmaksām.
Key services
ERP systems, CRM systems, IT consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Yoast SEO Premium, Ecwid Shopping Cart, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with granular controls
  • Use of security and analytics scripts with consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, LinkedIn Insight
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
LinkedIn Insight Tag
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses WordPress CMS with modern plugins and SEO tools
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories and controls
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  5. Multiple third-party integrations for analytics and marketing
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page
  7. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service page detected in provided content
  8. Website content is in Latvian with English alternate language available
  9. No signs of adult or malicious content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO Premium, Ecwid e-commerce integration, and multiple analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, and Facebook Pixel. The site uses cookie consent management via Cookiebot with granular user controls, reflecting good privacy practices. Performance is moderate with preconnect and prefetch hints for external resources. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO is well addressed with canonical tags, alternate language links, and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elva.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elva.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.