Skip to main content

Security report for elsis.lt

UAB ELSIS · Technology · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

27/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elsis is a well-established Lithuanian ICT group founded in 1991, offering a broad range of technology solutions including software development, telecommunications, and defense infrastructure projects. The company holds multiple ISO certifications reflecting a mature approach to quality, environmental, occupational health and safety, and information security management. Their market position is strong within Lithuania and the Baltic region, targeting government, defense, energy, and healthcare sectors. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common frameworks and libraries, delivering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and ISO 27001 certification, though lacking some HTTP security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is well addressed with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification but the professional site content and certifications support trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elsis.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
27

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elsis operates primarily in the B2B ICT sector with a focus on public sector and specialized industries such as defense and energy. Their business model revolves around delivering integrated technology solutions and infrastructure projects. The company benefits from a long operational history and recognized certifications, which enhance competitive advantage. Subsidiaries and partner domains indicate a regional presence including a Ukrainian market focus. The company maintains clear contact channels and detailed service descriptions, supporting client engagement and trust. Growth potential is supported by diversified sector engagement and compliance with international standards.

Security posture

Elsis demonstrates a mature security posture with ISO/IEC 27001 certification and HTTPS enforcement. The website includes cookie consent aligned with GDPR, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of visible security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP headers and publishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection) to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts or a security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and WordPress plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Consider adding a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB ELSIS
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB ELSIS
Description
Elsis is an information and communication technology (ICT) group of companies founded in 1991, providing software solutions, information systems, telecommunications, tactical communication systems, telemetry, environmental monitoring, housing management, building automation and maintenance, and defense and security infrastructure projects. The group includes UAB Elsis and UAB Elsis TS. Their main sectors include government institutions, defense and security, energy, environment, construction, transport, and healthcare.
Key services
Software development and implementation, Information systems, Telecommunications and tactical communication systems, Telemetry and environmental monitoring, Building automation and maintenance, Defense and security infrastructure projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.0, Modernizr, Google Maps API, Contact Form 7 plugin, Foundation CSS framework, SlickNav, Google Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Foundation
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of ISO/IEC 27001 information security management system
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian and English.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  4. Strong presence of ISO certifications indicating mature security and quality management.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  7. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for security hardening.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond basic plugins.
  9. No terms of service page found.
  10. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with plugins such as Contact Form 7 and frameworks like Foundation and SlickNav. It loads external resources from Google APIs and fonts, and uses jQuery 2.1.0 and Modernizr for compatibility and feature detection. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks some modern security headers and could benefit from performance optimizations and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elsis.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elsis.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.