Skip to main content

Security report for elocriativo.com.br

Elo Criativo · Technology · Brazil

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elo Criativo is a small Brazilian design and web strategy agency specializing in branding, web design, and graphic design services. The company targets businesses seeking to improve their digital presence through well-crafted design and web solutions. Their market position is that of a niche service provider with a portfolio showcasing diverse projects. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, Foundation, and various JavaScript libraries. The hosting is managed via Cloudez nameservers. Performance is moderate with a page load time of approximately 5.8 seconds and a page size of about 200KB. Security posture shows a valid SSL certificate but lacks advanced configurations such as HSTS, DNSSEC, and security headers. SPF and DMARC records are configured but with a relaxed DMARC policy. Analytics usage includes Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and RD Station, indicating moderate user tracking but no visible privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the website is professional and functional but could improve security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elocriativo.com.br

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
90
GDPR outside view
25
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elo Criativo operates in the technology sector focusing on design and web development services. Their business model revolves around providing tailored branding and web solutions to companies, leveraging technologies like WordPress and modern front-end frameworks. The company appears to be small-sized, founded around 2014, with a clear focus on the Brazilian market. Their portfolio indicates a diverse client base and a strong emphasis on quality design. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for improvement in regulatory compliance. The use of marketing tools like RD Station shows engagement in lead generation and customer relationship management. No partnerships or subsidiaries are explicitly identified from the data.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. The website benefits from a valid SSL certificate and correctly configured SPF and DMARC DNS records, though the DMARC policy is set to none, which limits its effectiveness. The lack of DNSSEC, CAA records, and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options exposes the site to potential DNS spoofing, certificate mis-issuance, and clickjacking attacks. The SSL configuration lacks strong cipher suites and HSTS is not enabled, reducing HTTPS security robustness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could lead to regulatory risks especially under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements to meet modern standards and compliance requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) DNS records to restrict which CAs can issue certificates for the domain.
  4. Configure essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  5. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a custom theme and uses a combination of front-end technologies including Bootstrap and Foundation frameworks. Hosting is provided by Cloudez, as indicated by the nameservers. The DNS setup includes valid A, AAAA, MX, and TXT records with SPF and DMARC configured, though DNSSEC and CAA are missing. SSL certificate is valid but uses an unknown algorithm and lacks strong cipher suites, which is a technical risk. Performance is moderate with a load time of nearly 6 seconds and a page size of about 200KB, suggesting room for optimization. The site uses Google Fonts and multiple JavaScript libraries including Google Analytics and RD Station for marketing and analytics. Accessibility and SEO are basic to good, but no advanced accessibility features were detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business but could benefit from security and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elocriativo.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elocriativo.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.