Skip to main content

Security report for elnet.ee

MTÜ Eesti Raamatukoguvõrgu Konsortsium · Education · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

54/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

MTÜ Eesti Raamatukoguvõrgu Konsortsium operates as a non-profit consortium dedicated to serving the public interests of Estonian libraries. The organization provides key shared services such as the E-kataloog ESTER, Eesti artiklite andmebaas, Eesti märksõnastik, and the E-varamu portaal, targeting libraries, researchers, and the general public interested in library resources. The website reflects a medium-sized, well-established entity with a consistent brand and a clear focus on education and information services within Estonia. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform using the Enfold theme and several plugins including Yoast SEO and Ajax Search Pro. It employs HTTPS with good SSL configuration and integrates Google Analytics with user consent mechanisms. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, including options for visually impaired users. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure channels. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's claims, reinforcing the legitimacy of the domain. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional digital presence for the consortium, with room for improvement in security transparency and incident response readiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Cloudflare, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elnet.ee

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The consortium holds a leading position in the Estonian library network sector, offering centralized access to millions of publications, articles, and archival objects. Its non-profit business model focuses on collaboration among major Estonian libraries, museums, and archives. The partnership ecosystem includes prominent cultural and educational institutions, enhancing its service offerings and reach. The website content and linked domains indicate a strong integration with national library and research infrastructures. Growth indicators include active promotion of services and participation in international user groups and seminars. Revenue streams are likely based on consortium membership and public funding rather than commercial sales.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS, cookie consent, and privacy policy compliance. The absence of security headers and incident response information suggests areas for enhancement. No signs of malware, phishing, or exposed credentials were found. The use of popular and regularly updated WordPress plugins reduces vulnerability risks, but continuous monitoring is recommended. The lack of a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the site is secure for typical user interactions but could benefit from formalized security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan accessible from the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program, including a security.txt file, to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user privacy controls and provide detailed data retention policies to strengthen GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
MTÜ Eesti Raamatukoguvõrgu Konsortsium
VAT number
EE100567317
Registration number
80013459
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MTÜ Eesti Raamatukoguvõrgu Konsortsium
Description
Raamatukogude avalike huvide ühiseks teostamiseks asutatud mittetulundusühing
Key services
E-kataloog ESTER, Eesti artiklite andmebaas, Eesti märksõnastik, E-varamu portaal, Teadusandmebaasid, Abiks raamatukogudele
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Enfold Theme 7.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Ajax Search Pro plugin, Google Analytics (gtag.js), jQuery 3.7.1, Modernizr 2.8.3
Frameworks
WordPress, Avia Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of sessionStorage checks for cookie consent

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally maintained non-profit consortium site for Estonian libraries.
  2. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with user consent mechanisms are implemented.
  3. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found.
  4. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present.
  5. Use of modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and SEO tools.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected in content or WHOIS data.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with official email and physical addresses.
  8. Good accessibility features including zoom and contrast options for visually impaired users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a stable and widely supported WordPress CMS with a reputable theme and SEO plugin, ensuring good content management and search engine visibility. The integration of Ajax Search Pro enhances user experience with advanced search capabilities. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading speed. Accessibility features such as zoom and contrast adjustments are well implemented. The site uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics, with user consent mechanisms in place. No hosting provider information was explicitly found, but the infrastructure appears reliable. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers, which should be addressed to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elnet.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elnet.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.