Skip to main content

Security report for elisity.com

Elisity · Technology · United States

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elisity is a technology company specializing in identity-based microsegmentation solutions designed to simplify network segmentation and enable Zero Trust security models rapidly. Positioned as a Gartner Cool Vendor in Cyber-Physical Systems Security 2025, Elisity targets enterprises across healthcare, manufacturing, and commercial sectors. Their platform offers advanced policies for users, devices, and applications, emphasizing ease of deployment without requiring agents or network changes. The company demonstrates strong market positioning with trusted industry partnerships and customer testimonials. Technically, the website is built on the HubSpot CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries and marketing automation tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, has good SEO practices, and maintains a professional design and user experience. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and basic security headers, though there is room for improvement in advanced headers and incident response transparency. The security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The company holds SOC 2 compliance, indicating a commitment to security standards. However, the WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency. Despite this, the website's professional presentation and trust signals mitigate immediate risk. Overall, Elisity presents as a credible and professional enterprise security provider with a mature digital presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elisity.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
95
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention elisity.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for elisity.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elisity operates in the enterprise network security market, focusing on microsegmentation and Zero Trust architectures. Their competitive advantage lies in rapid deployment capabilities and agentless solutions that integrate with existing infrastructure. Revenue streams likely include SaaS subscriptions and professional services. The target customers are medium to large enterprises in regulated industries such as healthcare and manufacturing. Growth indicators include Gartner recognition and multiple industry partnerships. The company leverages a strong marketing ecosystem with HubSpot and digital analytics tools, supporting lead generation and customer engagement. Strategic observations suggest a focus on expanding industry-specific solutions and compliance-driven features.

Security posture

Elisity demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, SOC 2 compliance, and no visible security misconfigurations. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of a public incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy indicates areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is indicated by privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and published security practices. No critical vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were detected in the website content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting and improve security transparency.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users and compliance with regulations.
  4. Provide explicit incident response contact information on the website to improve trust and readiness for security events.
  5. Monitor domain WHOIS registration status and ensure transparency to mitigate concerns related to domain legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Elisity
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Elisity
Description
Elisity provides identity-based microsegmentation solutions to simplify network segmentation with advanced policies for users, devices, and applications.
Key services
Identity-based microsegmentation, Network asset discovery, Network visibility, IoT, OT, and IoMT segmentation, Zero Trust microsegmentation, Compliance and ransomware protection
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HubSpot CMS, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Autopilot SDK, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Slick Carousel, Swiper.js
Platforms
HubSpot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers to obscure technology
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
HubSpot Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
HubSpot, Autopilot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Strong focus on identity-based microsegmentation and Zero Trust security.
  3. Multiple customer testimonials and industry trust signals present.
  4. Use of HubSpot CMS and marketing automation tools.
  5. No visible security or content blocking issues.
  6. WHOIS data missing, which is a concern but not definitive of illegitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern CMS platform (HubSpot) with integration of multiple analytics and marketing tools. The tech stack includes JavaScript libraries for UI animations and carousels, ensuring a dynamic user experience. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. The site uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and minimal security headers. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elisity.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elisity.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.