Skip to main content

Security report for elicit.se

AB Omegapoint · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AB Omegapoint is a Swedish cybersecurity and IT consulting firm serving multiple sectors including energy, banking, public sector, life science, defense, and retail. The company offers a broad range of services such as secure integrations, cloud services, application development, offensive and defensive security, and security advisory. With multiple offices across Sweden and Norway, Omegapoint positions itself as a trusted partner for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity posture and IT capabilities. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive contact information and service details. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Bricks Builder theme, integrates Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and consent management, and employs ClickCease for ad fraud prevention. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms but lacks explicit security headers and dedicated security or incident response policy pages. Overall, the website demonstrates a mature digital presence with good privacy compliance and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elicit.se

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Omegapoint operates in the B2B cybersecurity consulting market with a focus on critical sectors such as energy and banking. Their competitive advantage lies in specialized security services and a strong regional presence in Sweden and Norway. The business model revolves around consulting, managed security services, and software solutions like Craton™. The company maintains a professional brand image with consistent messaging and active social media channels. The presence of a dedicated career site indicates ongoing growth and talent acquisition. No direct parent or subsidiary companies were identified, but the company collaborates with partners and maintains multiple office locations. The website content and structure support lead generation and client engagement effectively.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot. The use of Google Tag Manager and ClickCease indicates attention to analytics and ad fraud mitigation. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security robustness. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of explicit incident response or security policy pages suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate website but could be enhanced with additional best practices and disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and embedded content for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Ensure SSL/TLS configuration is up to date and follows best practices for encryption and certificate management.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AB Omegapoint
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AB Omegapoint
Description
Omegapoint is a company offering cybersecurity and IT consulting services targeting sectors such as energy, banking, public sector, life science, defense, and retail. They provide services including secure integrations, cloud services, application development, offensive and defensive security, and security advisory.
Key services
Säkra integrationer, Molntjänster, Craton™, Applikationsutveckling, Offensiv & Defensiv säkerhet, Säkerhetsrådgivning
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bricks Builder theme, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, ClickCease
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical and external scripts)
  • Cookie consent via Cookiebot
  • Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to cybersecurity consulting.
  3. Multiple contact methods including emails, phone numbers, and contact form.
  4. Social media presence on Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, and MyNewsDesk.
  5. Cookie consent implemented via Cookiebot.
  6. No explicit terms of service page found.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. Use of Google Tag Manager and ClickCease for analytics and ad fraud prevention.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Bricks Builder theme, indicating a modern and flexible CMS infrastructure. It uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and Cookiebot for cookie consent management, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. The site loads multiple images with responsive srcsets and lazy loading, enhancing performance and mobile experience. The presence of offcanvas menus and accessibility features like skip links shows attention to usability. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The technical stack is standard for corporate websites, with no outdated or vulnerable libraries detected in the provided HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elicit.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elicit.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.