Skip to main content

Security report for elevup.com

ELEVUP · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ELEVUP is a Czech-based technology company specializing in advanced business and software development services. Their offerings include full stack development, mobile and web development, DevOps, cloud engineering, UX/UI design, and emerging technologies such as AI, AR/VR, and IoT. The company serves a diverse client base including media, automotive, fintech, and logistics sectors, with notable clients like ŠKODA Auto and RENOMIA. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure built on React and Next.js, indicating a mature digital presence. However, a client-side application error on the homepage negatively impacts user experience. Security posture is moderate with the presence of HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks explicit security headers and incident response contacts. The absence of WHOIS data raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, though the professional certifications and client portfolio support business credibility. Strategic improvements in security practices and domain verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elevup.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ELEVUP positions itself as a reliable B2B technology partner with a strong foothold in the Czech market and a focus on digital transformation projects. Their competitive advantage lies in a broad service portfolio and certifications such as ISO 27001 and TISAX, which appeal to clients requiring high security and quality standards. The company targets medium to large enterprises in technology-driven sectors. Revenue streams likely derive from software development contracts, cloud engineering, and consulting services. The partnership ecosystem includes prominent regional brands, enhancing market credibility. Growth indicators include recent project launches and active social media engagement. Operationally, the company emphasizes quality and security, aligning with industry best practices.

Security posture

The current security maturity of ELEVUP is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism, indicating baseline privacy compliance. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. The client-side error on the homepage may expose the site to usability and potential security risks. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, which could hinder timely handling of security incidents. Certifications like ISO 27001 and TISAX suggest internal security governance is strong, but external-facing security controls need enhancement. Compliance with GDPR appears adequate but could be improved with clearer data retention and user rights information.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve client-side JavaScript errors to improve user experience and reduce security risks.
  2. Implement comprehensive security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to harden the website.
  3. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information to improve domain legitimacy and trust.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response contact and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ELEVUP
Description
ELEVUP provides top-tier business and software development services including full stack development, web and mobile development, DevOps, cloud engineering, UX/UI design, AI, AR/VR, and IoT solutions. They serve clients in media, entertainment, fintech, logistics, and automotive sectors.
Key services
Full stack development, Web Development, Mobile development, Quality assurance, UX/UI design, DevOps & Cloud engineering, Artificial intelligence, Augmented & Virtual reality, Internet of Things, Staff augmentation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, JavaScript, Webpack
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by Google Tag Manager script loaded over HTTPS)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
poor
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Homepage shows a client-side application error impacting user experience
  2. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks (Next.js, React)
  3. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating privacy awareness
  4. WHOIS data is unavailable, raising questions about domain registration status
  5. Multiple ISO certifications and TISAX indicate strong security and quality management focus
  6. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address
  7. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Instagram, Twitter (X), and GitHub
  8. No visible forms on homepage; contact likely via email or contact page
  9. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  10. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, leveraging server-side rendering and client-side hydration. The presence of multiple preloaded fonts and CSS files indicates attention to performance optimization, though the visible client-side error suggests incomplete error handling. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing, reflecting integration with standard digital marketing tools. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless CMS solution. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is contemporary but requires refinement in error management and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elevup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elevup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.