Skip to main content

Security report for elementdigital.lv

Element Digital Full · Technology · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Element Digital Full is a small digital agency based in Latvia, specializing in empathy-first digital solutions including web design, UI/UX audits, design systems, animation, web development, social media, and performance marketing. The website is built on the Readymag platform, leveraging modern web fonts and animation technologies to deliver a visually appealing user experience. Analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Hotjar are integrated for user behavior tracking. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance posture. Security headers and advanced security configurations are not evident, suggesting room for improvement in security best practices. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and registration details. Overall, the website presents a professional digital presence but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elementdigital.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a digital agency targeting clients needing comprehensive digital solutions, including design and marketing services. Its market positioning appears focused on empathy-driven digital experiences, which may differentiate it in the competitive digital agency landscape. The business model revolves around service provision rather than product sales, with a likely revenue stream from client projects and marketing campaigns. The target audience includes businesses and individuals seeking digital transformation and marketing support. The company was founded in 2020, indicating a relatively new market entrant. No parent or subsidiary relationships are evident. The website content quality and branding consistency are good, supporting a credible professional image.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate but lacks several key elements. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the data. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The site uses third-party analytics and tracking scripts, which require proper management to avoid privacy issues. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and preparedness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies further weakens compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security maturity level is basic, with recommendations to implement stronger security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common attacks.
  3. Verify and strengthen SSL/TLS configuration to ensure secure communications.
  4. Establish and disclose a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Element Digital Full
Description
We provide empathy first digital solutions. We will gladly help you with web design and development, social media or performance marketing.
Key services
web design, UI/UX audits, design systems, animation, web development, social media, performance marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Readymag, Google Fonts (Roboto, Poppins), Typekit Fonts, Hotjar, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Platforms
Readymag
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built using Readymag platform with custom fonts and animations.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. No security or incident response policies visible.
  6. Uses Google Analytics and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Readymag platform, which provides a modern and visually rich environment with support for animations and custom fonts. The use of Google Fonts and Typekit indicates attention to typography and design aesthetics. Analytics integration with Google Analytics and Hotjar enables user behavior insights but requires careful privacy management. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the use of external resources and animations. No major technical issues or broken elements were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of explicit security headers and privacy controls suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas that should be addressed to reduce risk and improve user confidence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elementdigital.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elementdigital.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.