Skip to main content

Security report for eksei.lv

SIA "EKSEI" · Technology · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

33/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA "EKSEI" is a small Latvian company specializing in video surveillance equipment including cameras, DVRs, and accessories. Founded in 1998, the company positions itself as a niche provider focused on quality and efficiency rather than competition. The website reflects a basic digital presence with limited content and minimal modern features. The business targets local customers seeking surveillance solutions and related services such as installation, maintenance, and repair. Technical infrastructure relies on older technologies such as jQuery 1.8.3 and lacks HTTPS, indicating low digital maturity. Security posture is weak due to absence of SSL/TLS encryption, outdated libraries, and missing security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which raises compliance concerns. Contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and technical modernization to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eksei.lv

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
33

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on video surveillance hardware and services. Its business model appears to be direct sales combined with installation and maintenance services. The market position is small and local with no evident partnerships or subsidiaries. Revenue streams likely come from product sales and service contracts. The website content and structure suggest a modest investment in digital marketing and customer engagement. The lack of social media presence and modern analytics tools indicates limited digital marketing sophistication. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the website. The company emphasizes quality and speed in service delivery as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS exposes users to risks of data interception and undermines trust. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities exploitable by attackers. No security headers or secure form handling are evident. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response readiness is not demonstrated, with no security or abuse contact information provided. The security culture appears minimal, with no visible efforts to communicate security practices or certifications. These gaps pose risks to customer data protection and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS across the entire website with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements and consent mechanisms.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  5. Establish an incident response process including dedicated security contact emails (e.g., security@ or abuse@) and vulnerability disclosure guidelines.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "EKSEI"
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "EKSEI"
Description
Firma "EKSEI" reģistrēta 1998. gada 5. jūnijā. Mēs necenšamies kādam ko pierādīt vai ar kādu konkurēt. Mēs tikai darām savu darbu perfekti. Mēs esam ļoti slinki, tāpēc darām savu darbu ātri un dārgi, lai vēlāk nebūtu jāpārtaisa.
Key services
videokameras, DVR, aksesuāri, uzstādīšana, apkalpošana, remonts, citi pakalpojumi
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.8.3, HTML5, CSS, Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info extracted.
  3. Website uses outdated jQuery 1.8.3 and loads all resources over HTTP, no HTTPS detected.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  5. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly provided in footer.
  6. No forms detected on homepage to analyze data collection or security.
  7. No social media links or security incident contacts found.
  8. Content is business focused on video surveillance equipment and services in Latvia.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected; content safety rating is safe.
  10. Technical implementation is basic with moderate performance and SEO.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a basic technology stack with HTML5, CSS, and jQuery 1.8.3 loaded from both Google CDN and local fallback. Google Fonts are used for typography. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected. The site loads all resources over HTTP, lacking HTTPS which is a critical security and trust issue. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern optimization techniques. Mobile optimization is basic with viewport meta tag present but no advanced responsive design features detected. Accessibility features are minimal. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The site structure is simple with clear navigation but limited content depth. Technical debt is evident due to outdated libraries and missing security best practices. Modernization opportunities include adopting HTTPS, upgrading libraries, implementing CMS or frameworks for better content management, and improving SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eksei.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eksei.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.