Skip to main content

Security report for ekoselect.com

ECOLINE CROATIA · Technology · Croatia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ECOLINE CROATIA offers a specialized IT solution named EKO PRIJAVA designed for efficient reporting and monitoring of field problems such as communal, construction, and road issues. Their solution includes a mobile application for quick problem reporting and a web-based administrative portal for managing reports, analytics, and work orders. The business targets municipalities, communal companies, construction firms, and other organizations requiring precise field issue tracking. The website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme, employing standard web technologies and cloud hosting for accessibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content is professional and business-focused. Overall, the site provides a functional and informative platform but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekoselect.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector, providing SaaS solutions tailored to public and private sector clients in Croatia and similar markets. Their competitive advantage lies in a customizable, easy-to-use mobile app integrated with a web portal for comprehensive issue management. Revenue likely derives from annual licensing fees and cloud service subscriptions. The target customers include government entities, communal services, construction companies, and nature park management. The website demonstrates consistent branding and good content quality, with client references and detailed FAQs enhancing credibility. However, the lack of detailed company registration information and physical contact details limits full business transparency. Growth potential exists through expanding client base and feature enhancements driven by client feedback.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies is present, and no security certifications are displayed. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern for trust and legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in policy transparency, header implementation, and domain registration verification to enhance trustworthiness and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
  3. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve security transparency.
  4. Verify and update domain WHOIS registration details to enhance legitimacy and trust.
  5. Consider adding detailed company contact information including phone numbers and physical addresses to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ECOLINE CROATIA
Description
ECOLINE CROATIA provides an IT solution called EKO PRIJAVA for reporting and monitoring field problems such as communal, construction, and road issues. It includes a mobile app for quick reporting and a web portal for administration and analytics.
Key services
Mobile application for problem reporting, Web portal for administration and analytics, Cloud-based hosting, Customizable reporting reasons and workflows, Work order creation and notifications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Enfold Theme
Frameworks
Enfold WordPress Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. Contact information limited to a single company email address; no phone or physical address found.
  4. Website uses WordPress with Enfold theme and standard web technologies.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is used.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database, raising legitimacy concerns.
  8. Content is business-focused, describing an IT solution for field problem reporting.
  9. No adult or explicit content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Enfold theme, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external scripts or trackers detected. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features beyond basic levels. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or CDN usage beyond Google Fonts. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by adding accessibility enhancements, SEO metadata, and security best practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekoselect.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekoselect.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.