Skip to main content

Security report for ekomi.co.uk

eKomi Holding GmbH · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eKomi Holding GmbH operates a globally recognized SaaS platform specializing in authentic customer and product review collection and management. The company is positioned as a leader in the technology and e-commerce sectors, serving over 15,000 companies worldwide with a strong presence in 26 countries. Their services enhance business conversion rates and SEO through verified feedback integrated with major search engines and social commerce platforms. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks, delivering a good user experience and mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and valid certificates but lacks advanced security headers and features such as HSTS and OCSP stapling. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and GDPR considerations. Overall, the site demonstrates good business credibility with comprehensive contact information, testimonials, and industry awards.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of ekomi.co.uk. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekomi.co.uk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eKomi's market positioning as a trusted feedback company is reinforced by its backing from Goldman Sachs and Google accreditation. Their business model focuses on SaaS delivery of review management solutions integrated with e-commerce and marketing platforms. The company targets businesses aiming to improve online reputation and conversion through authentic user-generated content. Their ecosystem includes partnerships with various platforms and a global footprint supported by multilingual and multinational offices. Growth indicators include a large volume of collected reviews and a broad client base. Strategic partnerships and integration capabilities enhance their competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with TLS 1.3 and 1.2 protocols, ensuring encrypted communications. SPF and DMARC records are correctly configured, reducing email spoofing risks. However, the absence of HSTS and OCSP stapling reduces protection against certain attack vectors. The lack of certificate transparency compliance and explicit strong cipher suite configuration are areas for improvement. No critical vulnerabilities such as Heartbleed or FREAK were detected. Security headers are minimal, and no explicit incident response or security policy pages were found, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance and incident management readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  3. Achieve certificate transparency compliance to enhance trust and detect certificate mis-issuance.
  4. Add comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Develop and publish formal security policies and incident response procedures accessible on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eKomi Holding GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress 6.0.2, utilizing popular JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Bootstrap for responsive design and UI components. Autoptimize is used for asset optimization, improving load times. The site integrates third-party services such as Typekit for fonts, CookieScript for consent management, Google Analytics for traffic analysis, and Intercom for customer engagement. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in resource loading and caching strategies. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and semantic HTML improvements. SEO is supported by meta tags and structured content but lacks JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100 +12Medium34 findingsView report
  2. 53/100Medium26 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekomi.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekomi.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.