Skip to main content

Security report for ekobilet.pl

EKOBILET S.A. · Technology · Poland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EKOBILET S.A. operates a Polish-language online ticket sales and event management platform targeting organizers of concerts, festivals, and cultural events. The platform offers a comprehensive suite of services including ticket sales both online and offline, event promotion, participant verification, reporting tools, and secure payment processing. The company positions itself as an innovative and flexible solution for both small and large event organizers, emphasizing ease of use and faster payment receipt. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and reCAPTCHA for security and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, CSRF tokens, and captcha protections, though it lacks explicit security policies and some security headers. The domain is well aged and consistent with the business claims, enhancing trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with GDPR cookie requirements, though it could improve transparency around security policies and incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekobilet.pl

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets event organizers and ticket buyers primarily in Poland, leveraging a SaaS business model for ticket sales and event management. Its competitive advantage lies in combining ticket sales with promotional and management tools, including voucher generation and streaming event support. The presence of partner logos from PARP and the EU suggests institutional support or funding. The platform integrates extensive marketing and analytics tools to optimize event promotion and sales. The business appears medium-sized with a stable market presence since 2009. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the site suggests a focus on digital engagement via forms. Strategic partnerships and a clear value proposition position EKOBILET well in the Polish event ticketing market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection on forms, and Google reCAPTCHA to prevent spam. Tracking scripts are implemented responsibly with consent mechanisms. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security.txt files indicates room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Security headers appear missing or not visible in the provided data, which could be enhanced. Overall, the security posture is good but could be elevated by publishing formal security documentation and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Add and enforce security HTTP headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to enhance DNS security.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Provide direct company contact information such as support emails or phone numbers to improve user trust and accessibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EKOBILET S.A.
Description
Internetowy system sprzedaży biletów na koncerty i wydarzenia, oferujący prostą obsługę dla początkujących organizatorów oraz elastyczność dla większych wydarzeń i festiwali. Platforma umożliwia sprzedaż, planowanie i zarządzanie wydarzeniami z szybkim dostępem do płatności.
Key services
sprzedaż biletów online i offline, promocja wydarzeń, weryfikacja uczestników, generowanie raportów, bezpieczne płatności, tworzenie voucherów i kodów zniżkowych, wsparcie klienta
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, reCAPTCHA v2, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Polish language targeting event organizers and ticket buyers.
  3. Comprehensive use of tracking and marketing tools with GDPR-compliant cookie banner.
  4. Contact information is primarily via contact form with captcha; no direct email or phone numbers publicly listed.
  5. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts published.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and domain is well aged, supporting business credibility.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. No explicit terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and standard technology stack including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and Bootstrap for responsive design. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly with proper meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The presence of CSRF tokens and reCAPTCHA indicates attention to security in form handling. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and security headers to reduce technical risks and enhance user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekobilet.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekobilet.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.