Skip to main content

Security report for eklips.se

Eklips Digital · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eklips Digital is a specialized provider of subscription-based corporate websites, targeting listed and non-listed companies primarily in the Nordic region. Founded in 2011, the company offers a Corporate Website as a Service (CWaaS) platform that includes web development, design, branding, hosting, maintenance, security, and support services. Their market position is strengthened by serving 10% of Nasdaq Stockholm Main Market companies and delivering over 300 websites with a 99.9% uptime guarantee. The website is professionally designed using modern technologies such as Next.js and React, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.eklips.se raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional business presence but requires improvements in compliance and domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eklips.se

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eklips operates in the technology sector, focusing on corporate website solutions for a niche market of listed companies and IPO candidates in the Nordics. Their subscription-based business model provides recurring revenue streams and positions them as a trusted partner with a strong client base including reputable Nordic companies. The company’s competitive advantage lies in its specialized CWaaS platform and comprehensive service offerings covering design, hosting, security, and analytics. Growth indicators include a stable team size of 15 and a significant market share in Nasdaq Stockholm companies. The partnership ecosystem is visible through client logos but no direct partner domains are identified. Strategic observations suggest a focus on quality, reliability, and customer-centric service delivery.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS (implied by URL scheme) but lacks visible security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, absence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates gaps in security governance and incident readiness. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The security culture appears nascent with room for improvement in transparency and formalized security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and configure security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Verify and update domain registration details to resolve WHOIS inconsistencies.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eklips Digital
Description
Eklips is your trusted partner in delivering subscription-based corporate websites. Reliable. Agile. Empowering. They provide corporate websites for listed and non-listed companies, serving clients across the Nordics from Stockholm and Estonia since 2011.
Key services
Corporate Websites, Investor Websites, Transaction Websites, Other Websites (press, newsrooms, financial reports, campaigns)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, JavaScript, CSS, Webfonts (woff2)
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company emails and phone numbers.
  4. No security policy or incident response information is provided.
  5. No visible analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered under www.eklips.se, which is a concern.
  7. Website uses modern Next.js framework and React technology.
  8. Client logos and uptime guarantee indicate trustworthiness.
  9. No advertising or marketing tracking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack featuring Next.js and React, ensuring good performance and mobile responsiveness. The use of web fonts and CSS is optimized with preload hints. The backend appears to be WordPress-based, indicating a hybrid architecture. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and minimal blocking resources. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No major technical debt indicators were found, but the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests areas for modernization and risk mitigation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eklips.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eklips.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.