Skip to main content

Security report for eit.lt

UAB EIT sprendimai · Technology · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB EIT sprendimai is a medium-sized Lithuanian IT and telecommunications company, part of the ATEA Group, founded in 2019. The company offers a broad range of IT services including video surveillance solutions, information and management systems, telephony and call centers, video conferencing solutions, office equipment, and IT infrastructure. It holds multiple ISO certifications indicating a strong commitment to quality, information security, IT service management, and environmental standards. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides clear contact information and service descriptions, targeting business clients in Lithuania. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern libraries and analytics tools. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities, although cookie consent mechanisms and incident response contacts are missing. Overall, the domain registration is consistent and transparent, supporting the legitimacy of the business.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eit.lt

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as one of the largest IT and telecommunications providers in Lithuania, leveraging long-term partnerships with global manufacturers and a team of certified specialists. Its business model focuses on delivering end-to-end IT solutions from needs analysis to deployment and maintenance. Revenue indicators and client base size suggest a stable medium-sized enterprise. The parent company relationship with ATEA Group enhances credibility and market reach. The website reflects a professional brand with consistent messaging and trust signals such as ISO certifications. The company targets corporate clients requiring reliable IT infrastructure and communication solutions.

Security posture

Security maturity is high with implementation of HTTPS, multiple security headers, and adherence to ISO 27001 standards. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the website content. However, the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and explicit incident response contacts indicates room for improvement in GDPR compliance and incident management transparency. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is published. Overall, the security posture supports business continuity and data protection but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance features and formalized incident response communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and improve privacy transparency.
  2. Publish a terms of service document to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information, such as a security@ or abuse@ email address.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve inclusivity and compliance with standards.
  5. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB EIT sprendimai
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB EIT sprendimai
Description
Lietuvoje viena iš didžiausių informacinių sistemų ir telekomunikacijų įmonių, teikianti IT paslaugas, turinti ilgalaikius patikimus ryšius su pasauliniais gamintojais. Dirba aukštos kvalifikacijos sertifikuoti specialistai. Veikla sertifikuota pagal tarptautinius kokybės, informacijos saugumo, IT paslaugų valdymo ir aplinkos apsaugos standartus.
Key services
Vaizdo stebėjimo sprendimai, Informacinės ir valdymo sistemos, Telefonija ir skambučių centrai, Vaizdo konferenciniai sprendimai, Biuro įranga, IT infrastruktūra
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Google Analytics, Jetpack, Royal Elementor Addons
Frameworks
ISO 27001
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of validated libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Jetpack Stats
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Jetpack Stats
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No cookie consent banner detected, which is a GDPR compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and address.
  4. Security headers and HTTPS are properly implemented.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. Business is part of a known parent company (ATEA Group).
  7. Social media presence confirmed on LinkedIn.
  8. No terms of service or incident response contacts found.
  9. Multiple ISO certifications indicate strong quality and security posture.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS platform with Elementor page builder and several plugins including Jetpack and Royal Elementor Addons. It leverages jQuery and Google Analytics for interactivity and tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and loads with moderate performance. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and structured content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is well-maintained with no deprecated or vulnerable libraries detected. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement privacy compliance mechanisms. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eit.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eit.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.