Skip to main content

Security report for eightyeightthirty.one

Private by Design, LLC · Technology · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website eightyeightthirty.one is a small-scale technical project focused on building a graph of the Internet based on 88x31 badges, which are small link badges used on websites. The business behind the domain is registered as Private by Design, LLC in the US, indicating a privacy-conscious small entity likely operating in the technology sector. The site requires WebGL and JavaScript to function, and without these, only minimal placeholder content is visible. The technical infrastructure uses modern JavaScript modules and WebGL, with styling based on CSS variables and Material Design Components, suggesting a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact or incident response information is provided, which limits its compliance and trustworthiness. Security posture is basic with no detected security headers or advanced configurations, and DNSSEC is not enabled. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic, with room for improvement in security, privacy compliance, and user engagement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eightyeightthirty.one

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eightyeightthirty.one, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eightyeightthirty.one right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a niche technology project or startup founded recently in 2023, targeting users interested in internet link graphing and web technology enthusiasts. The business model is not explicitly stated but likely revolves around data visualization or internet research tools. The market position is early-stage with no evident partnerships or certifications. The company operates in the technology sector with a small organizational size. There is a partnership link to notnite.com, possibly indicating collaboration or shared ownership. Revenue streams and growth indicators are not discernible from the website content. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a project in development or a hobbyist initiative rather than a fully commercial enterprise.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low to moderate. The domain uses HTTPS (assumed but not explicitly confirmed), but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers are detected in the provided data. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of security best practices such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options headers is a concern. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present, and no security contact channels are provided. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site does not use tracking or analytics scripts, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security posture requires enhancement to meet industry standards and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information including support and security incident response contacts.
  5. Improve website content accessibility by providing fallback content for users without WebGL or JavaScript enabled.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
Building a graph of the Internet, one button at a time
Key services
Internet link graphing based on 88x31 badges
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript ES Modules, WebGL, CSS Variables, Material Design Components (MDC)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website requires WebGL and JavaScript to function properly.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or forms found on the main page.
  4. Minimal content visible without WebGL support or JavaScript enabled.
  5. No social media links detected in the HTML content.
  6. Site appears to be a niche technical project focused on internet link graphing.
  7. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected in provided data.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern web technologies including JavaScript ES modules and WebGL for interactive content, styled with CSS variables and Material Design Components. The hosting and DNS are managed via Porkbun and Bunny.net respectively. The site performance is moderate with no explicit performance optimizations detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features or ARIA roles observed. SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. The site lacks a CMS and appears to be a custom-built static or single-page application. Technical debt is low due to minimal complexity but modernization opportunities exist in security and compliance implementations. Technical risks include reliance on WebGL which may limit accessibility and user reach.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eightyeightthirty.one. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eightyeightthirty.one.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.