Skip to main content

Security report for eigenlayer.xyz

EIGENLAYER · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EigenCloud is a technology platform focused on blockchain infrastructure, enabling users to build verifiable applications, run AVS infrastructure, stake multiple assets, and scale data availability with EigenDA. The platform targets developers, blockchain operators, and crypto asset stakers, positioning itself as an innovative player in the decentralized infrastructure space. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image aligned with its business objectives. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with modern web technologies including Google Fonts, HubSpot analytics, and Cookie3 for cookie consent management. The platform demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with a clean and navigable user interface. SEO and accessibility are adequately addressed, though accessibility could be improved. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, uses security best practices such as adding rel='noopener noreferrer' to external links, and implements cookie consent mechanisms. However, it lacks explicit security headers and incident response contact information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear privacy and cookie policies, and GDPR compliance is indicated. Overall, the website presents a low-risk profile with a solid security posture and good business credibility. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eigenlayer.xyz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EigenCloud operates in the blockchain infrastructure sector, offering staking and verifiable service solutions that cater to developers and crypto asset holders. Its business model revolves around providing decentralized infrastructure services and enabling asset staking with rewards. The company leverages partnerships such as the Eigen Foundation to bolster its ecosystem. The presence of extensive documentation, blogs, and forums indicates a community-driven approach and a focus on developer engagement. The platform's growth potential is supported by its innovative technology stack and active social media presence. Revenue streams likely include staking fees, infrastructure operation rewards, and possibly enterprise services related to EigenDA. The company maintains a medium-sized profile with consistent branding and professional content, positioning itself as a credible player in the blockchain technology market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and best practices in link security. Cookie consent and privacy policies are well implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces moderate tracking but is managed with consent mechanisms. Overall, the security risks are low but could be further mitigated by adopting additional security controls and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and a clear vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance and user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to minimize potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EIGENLAYER
Description
Build verifiable apps, run AVS infrastructure, stake hundreds of assets, and scale with EigenDA.
Key services
Verifiable app building, AVS infrastructure operation, Asset staking, Data availability scaling with EigenDA
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts (IBM Plex Mono), HubSpot scripts, Cookie3 analytics, Google Tag Manager (gtag.js), jQuery 3.5.1
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Rel='noopener noreferrer' added to all external links
  • Cookie consent mechanism present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Cookie3 Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot analytics, Cookie3 analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. Strong focus on blockchain infrastructure and staking services
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible
  5. No direct contact phone numbers found
  6. No explicit security incident response contacts found
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected
  8. Social media presence on X (Twitter), Discord, GitHub, YouTube
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern front-end technologies such as Google Fonts and jQuery. It integrates HubSpot for analytics and marketing automation, along with Cookie3 for cookie consent management. The hosting is likely provided by Webflow's infrastructure, ensuring reliable uptime and SSL support. Performance is moderate with video backgrounds that may impact load times but enhance user experience. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is well addressed through meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eigenlayer.xyz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eigenlayer.xyz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.