Skip to main content

Security report for egelectronics.com

EG Electronics · Technology · Sweden

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EG Electronics is a well-established Swedish company specializing in the supply of electronic and electromechanical components and custom system solutions. With over 80 years of experience and a parent company affiliation with Kamic Group, they serve a global B2B market with a focus on industrial automation, embedded computing, and connectivity solutions. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with a professional design, clear navigation, and a commitment to sustainability. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Nuxt.js and Tailwind CSS, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, and is hosted on Microsoft Online infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, though DNSSEC is not enabled and explicit security policies are not published. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching egelectronics.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
95
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EG Electronics positions itself as a key player in the electronics and electromechanical components market, offering both standard and highly customized solutions. Their business model is B2B focused, targeting companies requiring specialized embedded systems and industrial interfaces. The company leverages partnerships with manufacturing suppliers and maintains a strong content strategy through news updates and sustainability messaging. Their affiliation with Kamic Group adds corporate credibility. The website's marketing and tracking tools indicate an active approach to customer engagement and lead generation. Growth indicators include participation in industry exhibitions and a focus on emerging regulatory topics such as the Cyber Resilience Act.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and domain transfer protection is active, reducing risk of domain hijacking. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found, which limits transparency for security researchers. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces some privacy considerations but is managed via consent. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be improved with enhanced DNS security and published security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Consider adding explicit terms of service to clarify user and customer obligations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EG Electronics
Description
We deliver electronic and electromechanical components and system solutions to companies worldwide. With over 80 years of expertise, we offer standard products from top suppliers alongside our own world-leading custom solutions. From concept to delivery, and beyond.
Key services
Electronic components supply, Electromechanical components supply, Custom system solutions, Embedded computers, Touch screen integration, Connectivity solutions, Software solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js (Nuxt.js), Tailwind CSS, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookietractor, DotLottie Player
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Client transfer protection on domain
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), LinkedIn Insight, Lfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Lfeeder
Marketing tools
Cookietractor
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and responsive layout.
  2. Content is business-focused with detailed product and news information.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting privacy compliance.
  4. No explicit terms of service or security policy pages found.
  5. No direct company emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content; contact is via form.
  6. Social media presence confirmed via LinkedIn link.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page detected.
  8. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  9. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools is evident.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Nuxt.js (Vue.js framework) and Tailwind CSS, ensuring responsive and performant front-end delivery. Integration with Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight, and Cookietractor indicates a mature marketing and analytics setup. Hosting DNS is managed via Microsoft Online, suggesting reliable infrastructure. The site loads multimedia content such as videos efficiently and supports mobile devices well. Some minor technical debt is noted in the absence of DNSSEC and limited accessibility features. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals effectively with room for incremental improvements in security and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with egelectronics.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review egelectronics.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.