Skip to main content

Security report for effet.info

Effet Webservice · Technology · Austria

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Effet Webservice is a small Austrian technology company specializing in server administration, TYPO3 CMS, WordPress, ownCloud/Nextcloud hosting, SEO, and web marketing services. The company targets businesses and organizations seeking professional web hosting and digital marketing solutions. Their market position is that of a niche specialist with a focus on TYPO3 CMS and managed hosting services. The website is professionally designed, consistent in branding, and provides clear contact information including a physical address and phone number. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery frameworks, delivering a moderate performance and good mobile optimization. The site uses HTTPS and includes proper meta tags for SEO but lacks advanced security headers and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but also a lack of privacy policy and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and absence of cookies but lacks security headers and formal security policies. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is justified for this business type, and no suspicious domain registration patterns were found. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation. The overall risk is low given the professional nature of the site and absence of vulnerabilities, but the company should enhance privacy compliance and security best practices to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching effet.info

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Effet Webservice operates in the technology sector providing specialized web hosting, CMS integration, and digital marketing services. Their competitive advantage lies in their expertise with TYPO3 CMS and managed hosting solutions tailored for small to medium businesses. The business model is service-oriented with revenue likely generated from hosting packages, SEO consulting, and web development projects. The target customers are businesses requiring reliable server administration and web presence management. Growth indicators include a maintained website with regular content updates and a newsletter. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related domains or subsidiaries were identified. Strategic observations suggest focusing on expanding privacy and security policies to meet evolving compliance requirements and enhance market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no cookies or tracking scripts present. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits readiness for security events. GDPR compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Data protection practices appear minimal but no exposed sensitive data was found. The security culture could be improved by formalizing policies and adding security.txt or similar disclosures. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process (e.g., security.txt).
  4. Improve website accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit and update technical stack and security configurations to maintain a strong security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Effet Webservice
Description
effet webservice ist Spezialist für Serveradministration, Typo3, WordPress, ownCloud, Hosting, Suchmaschinenoptimierung (SEO) und Webmarketing
Key services
Server administration, TYPO3 CMS, WordPress, ownCloud/Nextcloud hosting, Hosting, Search engine optimization (SEO), Web marketing, Newsletter services, Social media
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No cookies set
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages found
  3. No terms of service or security policy pages found
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email, phone, and physical address
  5. Website uses HTTPS and modern CMS TYPO3
  6. No tracking or analytics scripts detected
  7. No advertising or affiliate programs detected
  8. Content is professional and business-focused
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected with no public registrant info
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS with Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, indicating a modern but somewhat traditional technology stack. The site is mobile responsive and uses HTTPS, which is positive for security and user experience. Performance is moderate with compressed CSS and JS assets. No advanced analytics or tracking tools are used, reflecting a privacy-focused approach. The lack of security headers and formal privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but requires enhancements in security and privacy implementations to reduce risks and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with effet.info. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review effet.info.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.