Skip to main content

Security report for edusoho.com

EduSoho阔知网络 · Education · China

Medium risk. 11 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EduSoho is a Chinese digital learning platform provider with over 12 years of industry experience, focusing on enterprise training, customer training, and vocational education. The company offers a comprehensive platform plus course solutions that support scalable and customizable online education environments. The website is professionally designed with good content quality and targets businesses and educational institutions seeking e-learning and LMS solutions. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks such as Vue.js and Nuxt.js, along with Tailwind CSS for styling and several analytics tools including Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of visible privacy and cookie policies indicate gaps in transparency and compliance. Security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing security headers and clearer data protection measures. Overall, the site is functional and business-focused but would benefit from enhanced compliance and security practices to increase trust and legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edusoho.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
25
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EduSoho positions itself as a key player in the Chinese online education market, leveraging a platform-based business model that integrates course offerings with digital learning infrastructure. Its competitive advantage lies in its 12 years of experience and tailored solutions for enterprise and vocational training. The company targets corporate clients and educational organizations, providing scalable LMS and MOOC systems. The website's use of multiple tracking and analytics services suggests an active marketing and user engagement strategy. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data and absence of explicit contact information may hinder trust from potential clients. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The business appears medium-sized with a focus on technology and education sectors.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and modern JavaScript frameworks but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that enhance protection against common web attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published on the site. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and raises privacy concerns, especially without clear cookie consent mechanisms or privacy policies. The missing WHOIS data and domain registration transparency further reduce trustworthiness. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure programs or security certifications. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements in transparency, policy publication, and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available to improve domain registration transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EduSoho阔知网络
Description
EduSoho是以效果为核心的数字化学习平台产品，12年行业服务经验沉淀，支持企业培训、客户培训、职业教育等场景。提供平台+课程一站式解决方案，按需购买，自由扩容。企业学习平台排名有哪些？企业培训系统，e-learning系统，lms软件，网校开发，网校建设，网校搭建、内训系统开发就选EduSoho。
Key services
数字化学习平台产品, 企业培训支持, 客户培训支持, 职业教育支持, 平台+课程解决方案, 网校开发与搭建, 内训系统开发
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Nuxt.js, Tailwind CSS, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Baidu Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, ByteGoofy tracking
Frameworks
Vue.js, Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Microsoft Clarity, Google Analytics (via GTM), Baidu Analytics, ByteGoofy
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Baidu Analytics, ByteGoofy
Marketing tools
Microsoft Clarity, ByteGoofy
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language focused on digital learning platforms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  4. Multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts are used.
  5. No security headers or explicit security policies detected in the HTML content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, raising concerns about domain registration transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern front-end technologies including Vue.js and Nuxt.js, styled with Tailwind CSS, and enhanced with Swiper.js for interactive elements. It integrates multiple analytics and tracking services such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Baidu Analytics, and ByteGoofy. The site appears moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness. However, no CMS or hosting provider details were identified. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is good with appropriate meta tags and keywords. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts without visible privacy controls and lack of security headers. Opportunities exist to improve compliance and security configurations to reduce risk and enhance user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edusoho.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edusoho.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.