Skip to main content

Security report for edicy.com

Edicy · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Edicy is a technology company offering a SaaS platform focused on no-code landing page creation tailored for startups, small businesses, and marketers. The platform emphasizes ease of use, professional design templates, and integration with popular marketing tools such as Mailchimp, HubSpot, Google Analytics, and Meta. The website presents a polished, mobile-optimized user experience with clear navigation and comprehensive content about the product's features and benefits. Technically, the site leverages modern JavaScript libraries, analytics platforms, and a cookie consent management system to ensure compliance and user tracking. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit security headers and incident response policies are absent. The WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust, but the website's professional presentation and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance, with room for improvement in business credibility and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edicy.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Edicy operates in the competitive no-code SaaS market targeting early-stage marketing projects and small businesses. Its competitive advantages include ease of use, pre-designed themes, unlimited domains and leads, and integration with major marketing platforms. The business model is subscription-based SaaS with transparent pricing. The target customers are small business owners, solopreneurs, and marketers seeking quick landing page solutions without developer involvement. The company benefits from a strong partnership ecosystem with marketing tools and a history linked to Voog, a platform powering over 500,000 websites. Growth indicators include a focus on A/B testing and analytics to optimize conversions. Strategic observations suggest expanding security transparency and contact options to enhance trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a comprehensive cookie consent banner allowing users to customize or reject cookies. Tracking scripts from reputable providers are used responsibly with clear descriptions. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML source. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by publishing security policies and implementing additional HTTP headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses to strengthen business credibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Edicy
Description
Build high-converting landing pages without a developer. Perfect for startups, small businesses, and early-stage marketing projects.
Key services
No-code landing page builder, Pre-designed themes, Form capture, A/B testing, Integrations with marketing tools
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Segment analytics, Amplitude plugins, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes consent management
Platforms
Voog (hosting and tracking script)
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with customization and rejection options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Segment, Amplitude, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
doubleclick.net
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Segment, Amplitude, Mailchimp, HubSpot, Meta
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on no-code landing page creation for small businesses and marketers.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism with customization and rejection options.
  4. Use of modern analytics and marketing integrations.
  5. No visible security headers in HTML source; recommend adding.
  6. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  7. Contact information limited to email only; no phone or physical address found.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including JavaScript, Segment analytics, Amplitude plugins, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics. It uses Voog as the hosting platform, which provides performance and mobile optimization. The site is well-structured with valid HTML and CSS, includes meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing, and implements accessibility features such as ARIA roles and keyboard navigation. Performance is fast with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. The cookie consent mechanism is robust and user-friendly. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edicy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edicy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.