Skip to main content

Security report for edgepilot.com

Open Text · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website analyzed is a login portal for EdgePilot, a product or service under the enterprise software company Open Text. The portal is designed for enterprise users to authenticate and access services related to EdgePilot. The site is minimalistic, focusing on secure login functionality with a form protected by anti-forgery tokens and integration with OpenID Connect protocols. Branding and privacy policy links confirm affiliation with Open Text, a well-established technology company specializing in enterprise information management solutions. From a technical perspective, the site uses ASP.NET Identity framework and OpenID Connect for authentication, indicating a mature and secure identity management infrastructure. The technology stack includes .NET Framework 4.6.1, JavaScript, and CSS. However, no advanced security headers were detected in the provided data, and no cookie consent mechanism is present, which are areas for improvement. The site appears to be moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks comprehensive accessibility and SEO features. Security posture is moderate; the login form uses POST and anti-forgery tokens, but the absence of security headers and cookie policies reduces the overall security score. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the analysis. The WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable, which is typical for subdomains, but the domain is consistent with Open Text's ecosystem. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, allowing full content access. Overall, the site is a functional enterprise login portal with basic security and privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, cookie consent, and contact information visibility would enhance trust and compliance. The site is safe for general audiences and does not contain any adult or unsafe content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edgepilot.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Open Text is a large enterprise technology company focusing on information management solutions. EdgePilot appears to be one of its products, targeting enterprise customers requiring secure identity and access management. The business model is enterprise software and services, with a focus on secure authentication and user management. The portal serves as a gateway for customers to access EdgePilot services, indicating a B2B target audience. The lack of public contact information on the login page suggests a controlled access environment typical for enterprise solutions. The company maintains a strong brand presence and privacy compliance through its main site. No direct revenue streams or partnerships are evident from the login page alone, but the association with Open Text implies a mature market position and extensive partnership ecosystem.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is moderate. The use of HTTPS is implied but not explicitly confirmed in the data. The login form uses POST method and anti-forgery tokens, which are good practices to prevent CSRF attacks. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a notable gap. No cookie policy or consent mechanism is present, which may impact GDPR compliance. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available on the page. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is missing for the subdomain, but this is typical and not suspicious. Overall, the site could improve its security posture by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish clear security and incident response policies accessible from the login portal or main site.
  4. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility features to enhance user experience and compliance.
  5. Provide visible contact information or support channels for users encountering login issues to improve trust and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Open Text
Description
The website is a login portal for EdgePilot, a product or service under Open Text, a technology company specializing in enterprise information management solutions.
Key services
Identity and access management, Enterprise software solutions
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
.NET Framework 4.6.1, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
ASP.NET Identity, OpenID Connect
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of anti-forgery token (__RequestVerificationToken)
  • Secure login form with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for EdgePilot, a product under Open Text.
  2. No WHOIS data available for the subdomain, which is typical for subdomains.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the login page.
  4. Privacy policy is present and linked to Open Text's main site.
  5. No cookie policy or consent mechanism detected.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data; security could be improved.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No social media links found on this page.
  9. Content is minimal, focused on login functionality.
  10. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Microsoft .NET Framework 4.6.1 platform using ASP.NET Identity and OpenID Connect for authentication. The front-end uses standard HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with modular scripts for UI components. The site includes anti-forgery tokens to protect form submissions. Performance appears moderate with no heavy scripts or external dependencies detected. The site lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features but maintains a clean and functional design. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the data. There is no evidence of technical debt or outdated libraries beyond the use of .NET 4.6.1, which is a mature but older framework version. Modernization opportunities include upgrading to newer .NET versions and enhancing front-end responsiveness and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edgepilot.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edgepilot.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.