Skip to main content

Security report for edgeless.io

Antillephone · Technology · Curaçao

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Edgeless.io operates as a pioneering Ethereum-powered crypto casino, offering a variety of blockchain-based gambling games such as dice, roulette, blackjack, slots, and crash. The platform targets cryptocurrency users seeking transparent and provably fair online gambling experiences. The business holds a Curacao gambling license issued to Antillephone, aligning with its operational claims and market positioning as a niche leader in crypto casinos. The website demonstrates a professional design with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edgeless.io

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company leverages blockchain technology to provide provably fair gaming, differentiating itself in the online gambling market. Its business model focuses on Ethereum integration, appealing to crypto-savvy users. The presence of social media channels and a verification link to Etherscan enhances transparency and community engagement. The domain age and licensing indicate a stable presence since 2016. Partnerships with licensing authorities and affiliate programs like Changelly support its ecosystem. However, the absence of direct contact information and limited published policies may impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses privacy protection for domain registration, which is appropriate for its industry. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected, representing potential areas for improvement. The lack of published security policies and incident response contacts limits transparency on security readiness. Tracking and analytics tools are used moderately, but cookie consent mechanisms are absent, which may raise privacy compliance concerns. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and formalized policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add a cookie policy and consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to broaden user inclusivity and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Antillephone
Description
The world’s first Ethereum-powered crypto casino offering various blockchain-based gambling games.
Key services
Ethereum-powered casino games, Provably fair gambling, Various casino games including dice, roulette, blackjack, slots, crash, video poker
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 5.2.2, Web3.js 1.2.1, Pusher, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Intercom
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Ethereum blockchain
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of privacy protection in WHOIS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Intercom
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a crypto casino leveraging Ethereum blockchain.
  2. Content is professional and well-structured with clear navigation.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. Privacy policy present but cookie policy and terms of service not clearly found.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. WHOIS privacy protection used but justified for business type.
  8. Curacao license displayed as trust indicator.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Angular 5.2.2 with integration of Web3.js for Ethereum blockchain interaction. It uses modern analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, Intercom, and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, contributing to performance and security. The site is mobile optimized with good design quality and navigation clarity. However, the absence of a CMS and some missing security best practices indicate areas for modernization and technical hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edgeless.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edgeless.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.