Skip to main content

Security report for edgecdnplus.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EdgeCDNPlus.com is a small technology-focused website offering a CDN library service that provides developers with direct links to popular frontend libraries such as Bootstrap, React, Font Awesome, Material UI, Chart.js, and Animate.css. The site targets developers seeking easy access to these resources via a simple interface. The business model appears to be centered on content delivery for web development assets, although no explicit commercial or enterprise positioning is evident. The website content is basic but relevant to its developer audience. From a technical perspective, the site uses standard web technologies including Bootstrap 4.3.1 and jQuery 3.3.1 slim, hosted on Cloudflare infrastructure as indicated by the nameservers. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile use but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of a CMS or complex backend platform. The site is straightforward with minimal interactive elements. Security posture is limited; no security headers or HTTPS enforcement details are visible in the provided data. DNSSEC is not enabled despite Cloudflare DNS usage. The WHOIS data is suspicious due to a domain creation date set in the future (2025), which undermines trust and raises questions about legitimacy. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided, indicating low maturity in compliance and security transparency. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content. However, the lack of business transparency, privacy compliance, and suspicious WHOIS data reduce trustworthiness. Strategic improvements in security policies, compliance documentation, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edgecdnplus.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the technology sector, specifically targeting developers needing CDN-hosted frontend libraries. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating popular libraries under a single domain with easy copy-to-clipboard functionality. The business model is likely service-oriented, providing free or paid CDN access. There is no visible revenue model or partnership ecosystem disclosed. The target customer segment is developers and web professionals. Growth indicators and parent or subsidiary relationships are not evident. The site appears to be a small-scale operation with limited branding and trust signals.

Security posture

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement details, security headers, and DNSSEC reduces the defense-in-depth posture. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is available, limiting the ability to handle security events effectively. The suspicious WHOIS data further impacts trust. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security culture appears minimal and reactive rather than proactive.

Recommendations

  1. Enable and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS).
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and integrity.
  4. Provide clear contact information and establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Correct or update WHOIS registration data to reflect accurate domain creation date and registrant information to improve legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Provides a CDN library with links to popular frontend libraries and frameworks for developers.
Key services
CDN hosting for Bootstrap CSS, CDN hosting for Font Awesome, CDN hosting for React, CDN hosting for Material UI, CDN hosting for Chart.js, CDN hosting for Animate.css
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.3.1 slim, HTML5, JavaScript
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website provides a simple CDN library for developers with static links to popular frontend libraries.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business identity details provided on the site.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. WHOIS data is inconsistent and suspicious due to future creation date.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. Site uses Bootstrap and jQuery from external CDNs.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with Bootstrap 4.3.1 and jQuery 3.3.1 slim loaded from external CDNs. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS, but no advanced CMS or backend platform is detected. The site is moderately performant but lacks advanced SEO and accessibility features. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features. The site could benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, SEO meta tags, and accessibility enhancements. The lack of security headers and DNSSEC indicates technical debt in security configuration.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edgecdnplus.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edgecdnplus.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.