Skip to main content

Security report for edgebychaos.com

Chaos Labs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Edge by Chaos Labs is a newly launched decentralized oracle protocol designed to deliver real-time, contextualized data for on-chain applications. The platform offers specialized oracle services including price feeds, risk management oracles, and proofs for secure on-chain data delivery. Positioned as an advanced technology provider in the blockchain space, Edge targets developers and enterprises requiring reliable and high-precision oracle data. The website reflects a modern, React-based technical infrastructure with Material-UI components and Cloudflare DNS hosting, indicating a focus on performance and scalability. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs domain-level protections such as clientDeleteProhibited status. However, it lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, and does not publish detailed security or incident response policies. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with links to privacy and terms pages hosted on the Chaos Labs community site, but no cookie consent mechanism is present. Contact information is limited to an external contact page, with no direct emails or phone numbers on the site. Overall, the website demonstrates a good level of professionalism and technical maturity for a startup in the blockchain oracle sector. The security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published incident response details. Privacy compliance should be strengthened by implementing cookie consent and clearer GDPR indicators. The business credibility is supported by consistent branding and linkage to the parent Chaos Labs entity. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and improving privacy compliance mechanisms to build greater trust and security assurance for users and partners.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edgebychaos.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Edge operates in the decentralized oracle market, providing critical infrastructure for blockchain applications that require reliable external data. Its competitive advantage lies in integrating advanced risk engines and anomaly detection powered by Chaos Labs, positioning it as a technology innovator. The business model likely involves offering oracle data feeds as a service to blockchain developers and enterprises. The target customers are developers building DeFi, gaming, and other on-chain applications needing trustworthy data. The partnership with Chaos Labs enhances credibility and ecosystem integration. Growth indicators include recent domain registration and active social media presence. The company appears focused on technology innovation and market penetration within the blockchain infrastructure sector.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and domain-level EPP protections, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and published security policies reveals gaps in defense-in-depth and transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting readiness and trust. Privacy compliance is partial, lacking cookie consent mechanisms. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in the analyzed content. To improve, the organization should implement DNSSEC, add security headers, publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies, and enhance privacy controls. These steps will reduce risk and improve compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a clear vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  5. Develop and publish incident response and security policies to demonstrate security culture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Chaos Labs
Description
The advanced decentralized oracle protocol delivering real-time contextualized data for any on-chain application
Key services
Price Oracles, Risk Oracles, Proofs for onchain data delivery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Material-UI, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on decentralized oracle technology powered by Chaos Labs.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site; contact is via external Chaos Labs contact page.
  4. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR-related privacy policy presence.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  6. Modern React-based frontend with Material-UI components.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML.
  8. Social media presence includes Twitter and LinkedIn links to Chaos Labs profiles.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is newly registered with professional DNS setup but no DNSSEC.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React with Material-UI components, indicating a modern frontend framework choice. Hosting appears to leverage Cloudflare DNS services, providing reliable DNS management and potential CDN benefits. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate based on the complexity of SVG graphics and React usage. No CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to DNS attacks and clickjacking. Modernization opportunities include adding progressive web app features and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edgebychaos.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edgebychaos.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.