Skip to main content

Security report for ecrimex.net

eCrime eXchange · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eCrime eXchange is a specialized cybersecurity intelligence platform focused on sharing and tracking malicious domains, cryptocurrency addresses, phishing attempts, malicious IPs, and SMS threats. The platform targets security professionals and organizations seeking threat intelligence to enhance their cyber defense capabilities. The website demonstrates a mature technical infrastructure built on modern frameworks such as Laravel and Vue.js, indicating a good level of digital maturity and responsiveness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and client-side protections, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the platform appears legitimate and stable, with a domain age supporting its business history. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security headers would strengthen trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecrimex.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
95
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the cybersecurity technology sector, providing niche threat intelligence services. Its market position is that of a specialized platform catering to cyber threat analysts and security teams. The business model likely involves subscription or membership access to threat data and reporting tools. The platform's key services include monitoring malicious domains, cryptocurrency addresses, phishing, malicious IPs, and SMS threats. The company has maintained a consistent brand presence since 2009, indicating stability. The lack of public contact information and policies on the login page suggests a controlled access environment, typical for sensitive intelligence platforms. The presence of an administrative subdomain indicates internal management capabilities. No partnerships or subsidiaries beyond the admin subdomain are evident from the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern web technologies, which is positive for security. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No explicit HTTP security headers were detected in the HTML content, which could expose the site to clickjacking, XSS, or other web-based attacks. The login form uses standard input types and likely benefits from Laravel's CSRF protections, but no explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct audits to improve compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eCrime eXchange
Description
eCrime eXchange appears to be a platform related to cybercrime intelligence sharing or exchange, targeting security professionals and organizations interested in malicious domain, cryptocurrency addresses, phishing, malicious IPs, and SMS data.
Key services
Malicious domain tracking, Cryptocurrency address monitoring, Phishing detection and reporting, Malicious IP tracking, Malicious SMS reporting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Vue.js, Laravel, Inertia.js, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Laravel, Inertia.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client-side input validation on login form
  • Use of CSRF tokens implied by Laravel routes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the login page.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the login page.
  4. The site uses modern JavaScript frameworks and appears to be a specialized cyber threat intelligence platform.
  5. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content; DNSSEC not enabled.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided content.
  7. Login form collects email and password with standard input validation.
  8. No social media links or company contact information visible on the login page.
  9. Logo image found at /build/assets/ecrimex_logo-b2739295.png.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Laravel backend framework combined with Vue.js frontend via Inertia.js, indicating a modern SPA approach. The use of modulepreload and CSS preloading suggests performance optimization efforts. Hosting is managed through GoDaddy as registrar, but hosting provider details are not explicit. The site loads fonts from an external Bunny Fonts CDN. The login page is well-structured with semantic HTML and responsive design elements. However, no analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which may indicate a privacy-conscious approach or limited marketing efforts. The absence of CMS suggests a custom-built platform tailored for cybersecurity intelligence. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in SEO and accessibility. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecrimex.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecrimex.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.