Skip to main content

Security report for economix.fr

EconomiX · Education · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EconomiX is an academic research laboratory specializing in economic sciences, affiliated with the Université Paris Nanterre and CNRS. It serves as a major research and training center in the Île-de-France region, with a focus on empirical and theoretical economic research. The website targets academic researchers, students, and institutions interested in economics. The business model is non-commercial, focused on research and education. The site is well-branded, consistent, and provides access to publications, events, and social media channels. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, and JavaScript libraries such as Animate.css and Leaflet.js. It is hosted on Alwaysdata and uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data is consistent with the academic nature of the site, showing a long-standing domain registration with a reputable registrar. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, and providing clearer contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching economix.fr

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
45
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EconomiX holds a strong position as a key academic research unit in economics within France, supported by major institutions CNRS and Université Paris Nanterre. Its competitive advantage lies in its integration of empirical and theoretical research with a large member base including doctoral candidates. The business model is research and education focused, with revenue likely from public funding and grants. The target customers are academic and research communities. The partnership ecosystem includes CNRS, the university, and media outlets. Growth indicators include active event scheduling and publication dissemination. The website supports this ecosystem with multilingual content and social media engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and does not publish a dedicated security policy or incident response contacts. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files. Data protection practices appear basic but compliant with GDPR as indicated by cookie consent and privacy policy presence. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found, but improvements are recommended to enhance security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Improve website accessibility compliance to meet standards such as WCAG.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to improve user trust and compliance with transparency requirements.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EconomiX
Description
EconomiX est un laboratoire de recherche de l'Université Paris Nanterre et du CNRS (UMR 7235) en sciences économiques alliant des démarches empiriques à des développements théoriques. Rassemblant environ 200 membres, dont une soixantaine de doctorants, EconomiX est l'un des quatre pôles majeurs de recherche et de formation à la recherche en sciences économiques d'Île-de-France.
Key services
economic research, academic publications, seminars and workshops, doctoral training, public dissemination via newsletters and media
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap (implied by navbar classes), jQuery (implied by dropdown toggles), Google Fonts, Animate.css, Leaflet.js (mapping library), bxSlider (carousel)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an academic research lab site affiliated with CNRS and Université Paris Nanterre.
  2. Content is primarily in French with English alternate language available.
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage or main navigation.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found except credits page with privacy info.
  6. No visible terms of service or vulnerability disclosure pages.
  7. Social media presence includes YouTube, LinkedIn, Bluesky, HAL, and podcast links.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  9. Site uses HTTPS and modern web technologies with moderate performance.
  10. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with a modern front-end stack including HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap, and JavaScript libraries such as Animate.css and Leaflet.js for interactive maps. It uses Google Fonts and bxSlider for carousels. Hosting is provided by Alwaysdata, a known hosting provider. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. There is no evidence of a common CMS like WordPress or Drupal, suggesting a custom or proprietary CMS. Technical risks are low but could be mitigated by updating security headers and improving accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with economix.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review economix.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.