Skip to main content

Security report for ecomi.com

ECOMI · Technology · Singapore

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ECOMI is a Singapore-based technology company specializing in blockchain-backed digital collectibles and digital asset protection. Their flagship products include the VeVe app, a marketplace for premium licensed digital collectibles and comics, and the Secure Wallet, a credit card-sized cold storage hardware wallet for digital assets. The company targets collectors and digital asset owners, positioning itself as an innovator in the emerging digital collectibles market. The website demonstrates a professional and consistent brand presence with strong integration of social media and reputable cryptocurrency exchanges for token trading. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO and accessibility basics, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security policies or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of WHOIS data and security policy documentation slightly reduces trust. The website is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, and content is safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing accessibility compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ecomi.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ECOMI operates in the technology sector focusing on digital collectibles and blockchain asset protection. Their business model combines a digital marketplace (VeVe) with hardware wallet sales, generating revenue from digital asset transactions and hardware products. The company leverages partnerships with major cryptocurrency exchanges to facilitate OMI token liquidity and trading. Target customers include collectors, digital asset enthusiasts, and blockchain users. The company shows growth potential in the expanding NFT and digital collectibles market. Their ecosystem includes social media engagement and content portals, supporting community building and brand awareness. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified, indicating an independent operation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of anti-bot measures like Google reCAPTCHA. Cookie consent mechanisms align with privacy regulations. However, there is no published security policy or incident response contact, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking pixels is standard but should be regularly audited for security. The lack of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is a gap in responsible security practices. Overall, the site is secure but could improve compliance and transparency by publishing dedicated security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Add explicit incident response contact information for security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ECOMI
Description
ECOMI is a technology company based in Singapore which aims to lead the way in the emerging digital collectibles space, as well as protection of digital assets. ECOMI offers a one-stop-shop for digital collectibles and digital comics through the VeVe app bringing pop culture and entertainment into the 21st century. Ecomi sees digital collectibles as a new asset class which offers intellectual property owners the opportunity for new revenue streams in the digital landscape.
Key services
VeVe digital collectibles marketplace, Secure Wallet hardware and app for digital asset protection, OMI token trading and tracking
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, WebFont Loader, jQuery 3.5.1, CookieConsent2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to blockchain and digital collectibles.
  3. Strong presence of social media and external reputable links.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly provided.
  5. Only one contact email found: hello@ecomi.com.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Cookie consent implemented with visible banner.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA, and jQuery 3.5.1. It loads fonts via Google Fonts and uses a cookie consent library for GDPR compliance. The site is custom-built without a known CMS, hosted likely on a CDN or cloud provider (evidenced by cloudfront.net usage). Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized images. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly implemented. Technical debt appears low, but accessibility could be improved. No major technical risks were identified, though ongoing monitoring of third-party dependencies is recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ecomi.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecomi.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.