Skip to main content

Security report for eclair.cz

eclair design s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eclair design s.r.o. is a Czech Republic-based company specializing in custom website development and web design services. With over 15 years of market presence and more than 250 completed projects, the company targets businesses, government offices, and organizations seeking tailored web solutions. Their offerings include modern cloud-based hosting using Amazon Web Services and a proprietary CMS called Pagebuilder, which supports comprehensive website management. The company also provides graphic design services to complement web development projects. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, Google Analytics for visitor tracking, and Google Maps API for location display. The use of a proprietary CMS indicates a degree of digital maturity and control over content management. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No WHOIS data is available, which limits domain legitimacy verification and slightly reduces trustworthiness. The site does not show signs of WAF blocking or malware, and contact information is clearly presented with company registration details. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices are recommended to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eclair.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a solid position in the Czech web design market, emphasizing custom solutions and long-term client relationships. Their business model focuses on service provision rather than product sales, targeting a niche of clients requiring tailored web presence including public sector entities. The partnership ecosystem includes several local companies and organizations, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include recent references and active client engagement. Revenue streams likely derive from web development contracts, CMS licensing or support, and graphic design services. The company’s strategic focus on modern cloud technologies and proprietary CMS development suggests a commitment to innovation and quality.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS weakens the overall security posture. No explicit privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. There is no evidence of a published incident response plan or vulnerability disclosure policy, which are important for security readiness. The website does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries visibly. Overall, the security culture appears basic but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eclair design s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ27208826
Registration number
IČ: 27208826
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eclair design s.r.o.
Description
Company specializes in custom website creation, offering web design services for businesses, government entities, and other organizations with a focus on modern cloud technologies and a proprietary CMS system.
Key services
Custom website development, Modern cloud technology hosting, Proprietary CMS (Pagebuilder), Graphic design services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Amazon Web Services (mentioned), Custom CMS (Pagebuilder), Bootstrap (implied by classes), Google Fonts (Roboto, Google Sans)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS implied by URL (https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Website uses modern web technologies and Google services for analytics and maps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company registration details.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  6. No security headers detected in HTML source; security posture can be improved.
  7. Content is business-focused, safe, and professional.
  8. Multiple client references and partner logos enhance trust signals.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, and Google Maps API for geolocation features. The proprietary CMS Pagebuilder indicates custom development capabilities. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized and has clear navigation. However, there is no evidence of advanced SEO techniques or accessibility compliance beyond basic levels. Technical debt appears low, but the lack of security headers and privacy compliance indicates areas for modernization. Hosting details are not explicit, but AWS usage is mentioned, suggesting reliable infrastructure.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eclair.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eclair.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.