Vass is a Spain-based technology consulting firm specializing in digital transformation services across a wide range of industries including banking, energy, insurance, retail, telecommunications, education, automotive, life sciences, logistics, travel, manufacturing, and public administration. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of solutions such as customer experience, marketing, cloud services, business automation, cybersecurity, software engineering, AI and data analytics, and SAP business suite implementations. Their market position is that of a large, established player with a broad industry focus and multiple global technology partnerships.
Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, leveraging modern web technologies including Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, SEO practices, and moderate performance. The hosting is provided by Hosting Concepts B.V., with a domain registered since 2018, consistent with the company's founding year.
From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect forms. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, indicating GDPR compliance. However, some security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not explicitly detected, and no public security policy or incident response contacts are published. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found, which could be improved to enhance transparency.
Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, with a strong business credibility and technical foundation. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing additional security headers, publishing a security policy and incident response contacts, and adding a vulnerability disclosure program to further strengthen security posture and trust.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
55
Email security
80
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
79
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention ecenta.com, from OffSeq Breach.
Total records
26
Employees
0
Customers
2
Third parties
24
Weak passwords
4%
1 subdomain affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ecenta.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Vass operates as a B2B technology consulting firm targeting enterprises across multiple sectors. Their competitive advantage lies in their broad industry expertise and partnerships with leading technology providers such as SAP, Adobe, AWS, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, Salesforce, and others. The business model focuses on delivering digital transformation and technology integration services, generating revenue through consulting, implementation, and managed services. The company targets large organizations seeking modernization and innovation. Growth indicators include a comprehensive service portfolio and global presence. The partnership ecosystem is robust, enhancing credibility and market reach. Operationally, the company maintains a professional digital presence with clear navigation and content relevant to their target markets.
Security posture
The security maturity of the website is moderate to good. HTTPS is enforced, and Google reCAPTCHA is used to protect user input forms, reducing spam and automated attacks. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options suggests room for improvement in mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and may impact incident handling readiness. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file is present, limiting external security researcher engagement. Overall, the site demonstrates basic security hygiene but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.
Recommendations
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file to engage with security researchers and improve security posture.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are used and maintain secure form handling practices.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Vass
Description
Vass is a technology consulting company offering digital transformation services across multiple industries including banking, energy, insurance, retail, telecom, education, automotive, life sciences, logistics, travel, manufacturing, and public administration. They provide solutions such as customer experience, marketing, cloud, business automation, cybersecurity, software engineering, AI & data, and SAP business suite.
Key services
Customer Experience, Marketing & Admartech, Cloud, Business Automation, Cybersecurity, Software Engineering, Disruptive Technologies, Business Agility, SAP Business Suite, Artificial Intelligence & Data
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, Adobe Helix RUM, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
Cookie consent mechanism implemented
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Adobe Helix RUM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website uses Adobe Experience Manager CMS.
Comprehensive navigation with multiple industry and solution pages.
Strong presence of privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms.
Use of multiple marketing and analytics tools.
No visible security policy or incident response contact.
No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
WHOIS data is transparent and domain is well maintained.
No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on Adobe Experience Manager, a robust enterprise CMS platform, indicating a mature technical infrastructure. It integrates multiple modern technologies such as Google Tag Manager, reCAPTCHA, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Facebook Pixel, and OneTrust for privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized and uses canonical and hreflang tags for SEO and internationalization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve page load times. Hosting is stable with a reputable registrar. Technical debt appears low, but security header implementation and DNSSEC are missing, representing modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical stack supports business operations effectively with room for security enhancements.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ecenta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecenta.com.