Skip to main content

Security report for ebrand.com

EBRAND Holdings S.A. · Technology · Luxembourg

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EBRAND Holdings S.A. is a Luxembourg-based company specializing in brand protection, digital risk protection, and corporate domain management. The company offers expert consultancy and tailored software solutions to help businesses mitigate risks related to fraud, counterfeiting, phishing, and domain security. Their market position is that of an established international service provider with a medium-sized workforce and a strong focus on technology-driven solutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with comprehensive content targeting B2B clients across multiple industries and roles. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO Premium, with integrations for Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and ActiveCampaign for marketing and analytics. The site is multilingual, supporting several languages via WPML, indicating a global reach. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility is basic. Security is well-implemented with HTTPS, domain transfer protections, and cookie consent mechanisms, but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC and additional security headers. From a security perspective, the site shows good practices but lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are important for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be a gap in transparency. The WHOIS data is consistent and supports the legitimacy of the business, with a long domain history and clear registrant information. Overall, the website is professional, credible, and technically sound, with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ebrand.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
87
DNS health
90
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
73
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EBRAND operates in the technology sector, focusing on brand protection and digital risk management services. Their business model is B2B consultancy and software solutions, targeting industries such as automotive, finance, pharmaceuticals, government, and technology. The company leverages a strong partnership ecosystem and offers specialized services like VIP protection and crypto TLD management, positioning itself as a comprehensive provider in the brand security space. Growth indicators include multilingual support and a broad service portfolio. The company maintains a professional online presence with active marketing and analytics tools, supporting revenue generation and client engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain status flags that prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. The use of a cookie consent platform indicates awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some recommended security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy) suggests opportunities for strengthening DNS and web security. The lack of published privacy policy, terms of service, and incident response contacts represents compliance and transparency gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by addressing these gaps.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to harden web security.
  4. Provide explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information, including security contact emails.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.

Contact details published on the site

Legal name
EBRAND Holdings S.A.
VAT number
LU22551072
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EBRAND Holdings S.A.
Description
EBRAND provides expert technical guidance, strategic consultancy, and tailored software solutions for Online Brand Protection, Digital Risk Protection, and Corporate Domain Management.
Key services
Online Brand Protection, Digital Risk Protection, Corporate Domain Management, Intelligence and Investigations, VIP and Executive Protection, Domain Blocking Tools, New gTLDs and DotBrands, Crypto TLDs
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO Premium, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, ActiveCampaign, CookieHub, WPML (multilingual plugin)
Frameworks
WordPress CMS, Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain transfer and update protections enabled
  • Use of consent management platform (CookieHub)
  • No exposed sensitive data found in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Leadfeeder
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads (AW- IDs), Leadfeeder
Marketing tools
ActiveCampaign, CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and targeted to B2B clients in brand protection and digital risk.
  3. Multiple language support via WPML indicates international focus.
  4. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieHub.
  6. Security posture is good with HTTPS and domain transfer protections but lacks DNSSEC and some security headers.
  7. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools is evident.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO Premium for SEO optimization. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, ActiveCampaign, and Leadfeeder. The site supports multiple languages via WPML, indicating a robust internationalization strategy. Hosting appears to be managed through EuroDNS S.A., consistent with the domain registrar. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The site uses asynchronous loading for scripts to improve load times. Technical debt appears low, but enabling DNSSEC and additional security headers would modernize the security posture further.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ebrand.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ebrand.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.