Skip to main content

Security report for ebool.com

Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eBool is an online platform focused on helping businesses and professionals find software, apps, and digital solutions across a wide range of categories. It offers product search, reviews, and alternative product suggestions, positioning itself as a niche software discovery and comparison site. The website is designed with modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, providing a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, the technical infrastructure lacks advanced security headers and comprehensive privacy compliance mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises some concerns about domain legitimacy, although the website content and design appear professional and trustworthy. Overall, eBool serves its target audience effectively but should enhance its security posture and transparency to build greater trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ebool.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ebool.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
100%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ebool.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector, specifically in software discovery and review services. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing and advertising partnerships, as evidenced by the use of Skimlinks and Clicky analytics. The platform targets businesses and professionals seeking software solutions, offering a curated and categorized product database. The lack of explicit company contact information and WHOIS transparency suggests a small-scale operation or a startup phase. Growth potential exists through expanding content quality, improving privacy compliance, and establishing clearer business credentials. The partnership ecosystem includes affiliate networks and marketing tools but no direct business partners or subsidiaries were identified.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens for form security, indicating basic security awareness. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of contact information for security incidents further limits the site's security maturity. While no obvious vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the security posture is moderate and would benefit from implementing best practices and transparency measures to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web threats.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide verifiable company information to increase trustworthiness and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
A platform to find software, apps, and solutions across various categories such as software, web services, web hosting, and more. It helps users find top alternatives or similar products for any product.
Key services
Product search, Product reviews, Category browsing, Product submission
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts, Popper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in meta tag
  • Secure form submission via HTTPS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Clicky
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Skimlinks
Tracking pixels
Clicky
Marketing tools
Answerly
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and fully functional with no blocking detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible privacy protection or new registration.
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. Privacy and terms pages exist but lack detailed compliance indicators.
  5. No security headers detected, which is a security improvement area.
  6. Uses common web technologies and external services for analytics and affiliate marketing.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard modern front-end stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, FontAwesome for icons, and Google Fonts for typography. It loads external scripts for analytics (Clicky) and affiliate marketing (Skimlinks, Answerly). The site is moderately performant with no major errors or broken elements detected. SEO is basic with minimal meta description content and no Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data present. Accessibility is basic with some support for older browsers via HTML5 shims. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the source. The technical setup is adequate for a small business but could be improved with enhanced SEO, security headers, and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ebool.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ebool.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.