Skip to main content

Security report for ebe.cz

European Business Enterprise · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

European Business Enterprise (EBE) is a Czech-based company established in 2002 specializing in cybersecurity, software development, project management, data processing, GDPR compliance, and advertising services. The company positions itself as a provider of tailored solutions for businesses and organizations requiring comprehensive cybersecurity and compliance services. Their portfolio includes training, outsourcing, audits, and modular software tools designed for team collaboration in specialized fields. EBE maintains a network of related project domains that extend their service offerings in cybersecurity education, GDPR resources, and government-related information services. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, Flickity sliders, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting and domain registration are consistent with a Czech-based business, with no signs of blocking or WAF interference. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and professional design, although some accessibility features could be improved. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and security headers are areas for enhancement. From a security perspective, EBE demonstrates a solid posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. The company references compliance with ISO 27001, ISO 22301, and the NIS2 directive, indicating a mature approach to information security management. However, the lack of publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies and missing security.txt file suggest room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Overall, EBE presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with a strong focus on cybersecurity and compliance services. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy of the business. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and improving accessibility to further strengthen their security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ebe.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EBE operates in the technology sector with a focus on cybersecurity and compliance services tailored to Czech and EU markets. Their business model revolves around consulting, training, software development, and outsourcing. The company leverages certifications such as ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 to build trust and credibility. Their ecosystem includes partner domains offering specialized training and GDPR resources, indicating a collaborative approach to market presence. The absence of phone numbers and physical addresses on the website suggests a preference for digital contact channels. EBE's growth indicators include a diversified portfolio and long-standing domain registration since 2002, positioning them as a stable small-sized enterprise with a niche market focus.

Security posture

EBE exhibits a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. The company aligns with recognized security frameworks and standards, including ISO certifications and the NIS2 directive. However, the website lacks explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, which are recommended best practices. The absence of incident response contact channels and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and may delay response to security incidents. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from enhanced security controls and published policies to improve stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  2. Add and configure security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated contact channels for security issues.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
European Business Enterprise
Description
Provides tailored solutions in cybersecurity, software development, project management, data processing, GDPR compliance, and advertising.
Key services
Cybersecurity training and outsourcing, Audit and compliance (SŘBI, NIS2), Software development, Project management, Data processing and analysis, GDPR consulting and audits, Advertising services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Mapbox GL JS, Bootstrap, Flickity slider
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Lotus Notes/Domino (for internal systems)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Czech with some English elements.
  3. Strong focus on cybersecurity, compliance, and software solutions.
  4. Multiple related project domains indicate a broader ecosystem.
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. No visible phone numbers or physical addresses found in content.
  7. Contact primarily via email and contact form.
  8. No social media links detected in the provided content.
  9. Use of modern frontend libraries and analytics tools.
  10. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, Flickity for sliders, and Google Tag Manager for analytics integration. Hosting appears stable with a Czech registrar and no content blocking detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. The CMS or backend platform is not identified, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. SEO practices are adequate with proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks some security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. There is an opportunity to improve accessibility and implement additional security best practices to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ebe.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ebe.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.