Skip to main content

Security report for eavalportal.de

Axians eWaste · Technology · Germany

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Axians eWaste operates a specialized login portal for its e-waste management services, targeting business and enterprise clients primarily in Germany. The website is part of the Axians brand ecosystem, focusing on technology and environmental services. The portal uses modern authentication protocols such as OpenID Connect with PKCE, indicating a secure approach to user authentication. However, the website content is minimal and currently displays an error related to an invalid redirect URI, which may impact user experience and trust. Technically, the site uses jQuery and Keycloak for authentication, but lacks visible security headers and advanced SEO or accessibility features. The cookie consent mechanism and privacy policy presence demonstrate basic compliance with GDPR requirements. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and registration transparency, although the linkage to known Axians domains suggests it is a legitimate corporate asset. Security posture is moderate with good authentication practices but missing security headers and error handling improvements needed. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, the site requires improvements in content quality, error handling, and security hardening to enhance trust and user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eavalportal.de

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Axians eWaste is positioned as a niche B2B provider in the e-waste management sector, leveraging the broader Axians brand known for technology and energy solutions. The business model focuses on providing secure digital access to clients for managing e-waste services. The presence of related domains such as axians-infoma.de and eavalportal.de indicates a partnership ecosystem within the Axians group. The company targets enterprise clients requiring compliance and environmental responsibility. Growth indicators are not visible from the login page, but the technical infrastructure suggests a mature approach to client access management. Strategic partnerships and compliance with privacy regulations are evident, though public-facing business information is limited.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The use of OpenID Connect with PKCE is a strong authentication practice. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. The visible error message about an invalid redirect_uri parameter could be exploited for phishing or redirect attacks if not properly handled. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating gaps in security transparency. GDPR compliance is partially demonstrated through cookie consent and privacy policy links. The absence of WHOIS data is a potential red flag for domain legitimacy. Overall, the site should enhance security headers, error handling, and publish security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Improve error handling to avoid exposing sensitive parameters or internal errors.
  3. Ensure HTTPS is enforced with strong SSL/TLS configuration and test regularly.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to increase transparency.
  5. Enhance website content and navigation to improve user experience and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Axians eWaste
Description
Axians eWaste appears to be a business focused on e-waste management and recycling solutions, likely serving corporate or governmental clients with technology and energy sector relevance.
Key services
e-waste management, recycling services, secure login portal for clients
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Keycloak (authentication framework)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • OAuth2/OpenID Connect authentication
  • PKCE code challenge method used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a login portal for Axians eWaste service
  2. Page content shows an error related to invalid redirect_uri parameter
  3. No WHOIS data available for domain
  4. Cookie consent banner present with acceptance mechanism
  5. Privacy policy and imprint pages linked and accessible
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the login page
  7. No social media links found
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. Uses Keycloak for authentication
  10. External scripts loaded from trusted sources (jQuery CDN)
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a lightweight tech stack with jQuery 3.4.1 and Keycloak for authentication. The presence of a cookie consent banner indicates some privacy compliance effort. However, the site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features, and no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimizations detected. The login page shows an error related to redirect_uri, suggesting a configuration issue in the OAuth2/OpenID Connect flow. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, indicating minimal data collection. The site would benefit from modernization including responsive design improvements, enhanced accessibility, and better error management to reduce technical debt and improve operational stability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eavalportal.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eavalportal.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.