Skip to main content

Security report for easysites.gr

Lighthouse SA · Technology · Greece

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Easysites is a business unit of Lighthouse SA, a reputable Greek technology company with over 24 years of experience in web development and e-commerce solutions. The website offers premium web development services at affordable prices, targeting clients seeking quality digital presence using open source platforms like WordPress and Shopify. The company emphasizes transparency, professionalism, and comprehensive service including SEO and digital marketing. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor, uses modern libraries and plugins, and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for security and analytics. The security posture is strong with HTTPS, consent mechanisms, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust with a detailed privacy policy, cookie consent, and a named Data Protection Officer. Overall, the site reflects a mature digital presence aligned with business goals and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching easysites.gr

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Easysites operates as a specialized web development unit within Lighthouse SA, leveraging the parent company's extensive experience and resources. The business model focuses on delivering high-quality, cost-effective web solutions primarily to small and medium enterprises. The company differentiates itself by combining premium service quality with transparent pricing and a client-centric approach. Its market position is strengthened by the parent company's reputation and international footprint. The partnership ecosystem includes Envato Market for themes and plugins, and Google services for analytics and advertising. Growth indicators include a well-structured website with clear calls to action and multilingual support. Strategic observations highlight the importance of maintaining up-to-date security practices and expanding contact channels for enhanced customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact forms to prevent spam, and a GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which is an area for improvement. The absence of exposed sensitive data and the use of security plugins indicate good security hygiene. However, the lack of a dedicated security policy or vulnerability disclosure page suggests room for maturity in security governance. Incident response contact is available via the Data Protection Officer's email. Overall, the site is secure for its business scope but could benefit from enhanced security headers and formalized vulnerability disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and vulnerability disclosure page to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Expand contact information to include phone numbers and physical addresses for improved credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lighthouse SA
Description
Easysites (a business unit of Lighthouse SA) offers premium web development at affordable prices with 24 years of experience and transparent pricing.
Key services
Premium web development, E-commerce solutions, SEO and Performance Marketing, Digital strategy consulting
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Shopify, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2, Elementor, Contact Form 7, jQuery, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, AOS (Animate on Scroll), Isotope, Typed.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS, Shopify (mentioned as technology used)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v2 on contact form
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (e.g., WP Hide Security Enhancer)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Reddit Pixel, Cloudflare Insights
Marketing tools
Google Ads, Reddit Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Strong GDPR compliance with cookie consent and privacy policy.
  3. Professional design and clear navigation.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  5. Contact form includes consent checkbox for privacy.
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security issues detected.
  7. Business is a unit of a reputable company with long history.
  8. No suspicious or malicious external links.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Contact Form 7 for forms. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes, alongside Google reCAPTCHA v2 for spam protection. The site uses a variety of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, Bootstrap, AOS, Isotope, and Typed.js, indicating a rich interactive user experience. Hosting appears to be on Cloudways, a reputable managed hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. Technical debt appears low, but the site could improve by adding security headers and enhancing accessibility compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with easysites.gr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review easysites.gr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.