Skip to main content

Security report for easydmarc.asia

EasyDMARC Inc. · Technology · Iceland

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EasyDMARC Inc. operates a comprehensive SaaS platform focused on email security, specializing in DMARC, SPF, DKIM, and BIMI services to protect organizations from email spoofing and phishing. The company has established itself as a leader in the email authentication space, securing over 175,000 domains globally and serving a diverse clientele including enterprises and MSPs. Their business model combines managed services, free tools, and educational resources to facilitate DMARC adoption and compliance. Technically, the website is well-developed with modern frameworks and extensive analytics integration, hosted on Cloudflare for performance and security. However, a critical security gap exists due to the lack of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support on the easydmarc.asia domain, which undermines secure communications and user trust. The company maintains strong DNS and email authentication configurations, including a strict DMARC reject policy, and demonstrates good privacy compliance with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, EasyDMARC presents a professional and trustworthy digital presence but should urgently address SSL/TLS deficiencies to enhance security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching easydmarc.asia

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EasyDMARC holds a strong market position as a trusted provider of email authentication and security solutions, leveraging partnerships and certifications such as SOC Type 3 to build credibility. Their competitive advantage lies in simplifying complex email security protocols through managed services and user-friendly tools. Revenue streams likely include subscription plans, managed service fees, and enterprise solutions. The target customers are businesses requiring compliance with emerging email security regulations across various industries, including finance, healthcare, and government. Growth indicators include a large customer base, global presence, and active content marketing through blogs and case studies. The company also fosters a partner ecosystem with MSP and reseller programs, enhancing market reach and service delivery.

Security posture

The security posture of EasyDMARC is generally strong in terms of email authentication and DNS configurations, with valid SPF and a strict DMARC reject policy that mitigates spoofing risks. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS on the easydmarc.asia domain is a significant vulnerability that exposes users to potential interception and undermines trust. The lack of DNSSEC and CAA records further limits DNS security. The website employs standard security headers and privacy policies but could improve by enabling HSTS, OCSP stapling, and session resumption. Incident response contact information is not explicitly provided, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness. Overall, while the platform secures email flows effectively, web security practices require urgent improvement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and maintain a valid SSL/TLS certificate on easydmarc.asia and enforce HTTPS site-wide.
  2. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to strengthen HTTPS enforcement.
  3. Activate DNSSEC and add CAA records to enhance DNS security and certificate issuance control.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ emails.
  5. Regularly audit and update security headers and enable OCSP stapling and session resumption for improved performance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EasyDMARC Inc.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including Cloudflare for DNS and hosting, Bootstrap for responsive design, and multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Mixpanel, Hotjar, and HubSpot. The site is mobile optimized and accessible with good SEO practices. However, performance is slow with a load time of approximately 15.9 seconds and a large page size (~1.15 MB) with 184 resources, indicating potential optimization opportunities. The absence of SSL/TLS on the analyzed domain is a critical technical risk. The DNS configuration is robust with multiple A and AAAA records, Google MX servers, and valid SPF and DMARC records. The WHOIS data shows privacy protection but is consistent with the business profile and domain age. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires improvements in web security and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with easydmarc.asia. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review easydmarc.asia.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.