Skip to main content

Security report for e-signaturesecurisee.com

Dematis · Technology · France

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website e-signaturesecurisee.com is a French-language platform offering free electronic signature and signature verification tools primarily targeted at users equipped with valid digital certificates. It is part of the Dematis group ecosystem, which provides various related digital legal and administrative services. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and good mobile responsiveness, leveraging technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Java applets for its core functionality. However, the use of Java applets may pose compatibility and security challenges in modern environments. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content and links to Dematis and partner domains support its authenticity. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy, but lacks cookie consent mechanisms and terms of service pages. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but missing explicit security headers and policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-signaturesecurisee.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention e-signaturesecurisee.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for e-signaturesecurisee.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dematis operates in the technology sector, focusing on secure electronic signature solutions and related digital legal services. The business model includes providing free online tools to attract users while promoting certificate acquisition through partner sites. The company targets professionals and organizations requiring legally compliant electronic signatures. The website's integration with multiple related domains indicates a broad service ecosystem. Market positioning is that of a specialized, trusted provider in the French digital signature niche. Growth potential is supported by the increasing demand for secure digital transactions. However, the lack of visible contact information and incomplete compliance disclosures may limit trust and user confidence.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is moderate. HTTPS is used, but no explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected. The site does not expose sensitive data in the HTML, and no vulnerable libraries were identified. The use of Java applets requires careful security management due to their deprecated status and potential vulnerabilities. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism and incident response information indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. No vulnerability disclosures or security policies are published, limiting transparency. Overall, the site would benefit from enhanced security controls, formal policies, and improved compliance measures to reduce risk and increase user trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to harden the site against common attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish terms of service and a security incident response policy to improve legal clarity and preparedness.
  4. Replace or supplement Java applets with modern, secure web technologies to improve compatibility and security.
  5. Provide clear and accessible contact information including support emails and phone numbers to increase business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dematis
Description
Outil de signature électronique et de vérification accessible gratuitement en ligne, permettant de signer électroniquement des documents au format XAdES ou Pades et de vérifier une signature électronique.
Key services
Signature électronique de documents, Vérification de signatures électroniques
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, Java applets
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
tawk.to
Marketing tools
tawk.to live chat
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides free electronic signature and verification tools.
  2. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible unregistered domain or privacy protection.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the site.
  4. Privacy policy is present but cookie consent is missing.
  5. Use of Java applets may limit accessibility and modern compatibility.
  6. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  7. External links mostly to related Dematis group services.
  8. Live chat widget from tawk.to is embedded.
  9. No obvious security headers detected in provided data.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and FontAwesome for icons. Java applets are used for the signature and verification tools, which may limit usability on modern browsers and devices. The site loads external scripts including a live chat widget from tawk.to and jQuery from a CDN. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. SEO is basic with meta description and title tags present but no Open Graph or structured data detected. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and CMS are not identifiable from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced performance and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-signaturesecurisee.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-signaturesecurisee.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.