Skip to main content

Security report for e-s-g.com

ESG · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Epiphany Solution Group (ESG) is a technology consulting firm focused on delivering proven technology solutions to Fortune 1000 and enterprise clients. Their services include cloud digital transformation, IT security, network connectivity, data center solutions, SD WAN, and UCaaS. The company emphasizes transparency, integrity, and minimizing downtime to help clients excel in their core competencies. The website reflects a small but professional organization founded in 2021, with consistent branding and clear contact channels. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and technologies such as WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and integrates analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and HubSpot. The site is mobile optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and security headers present, though lacking published security policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is good with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is basic, with room for improvement in cookie consent and GDPR-related disclosures. The domain registration details align well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. The site uses multiple third-party marketing and tracking services, indicating moderate user tracking. Strategic recommendations include implementing a cookie consent banner, publishing security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, enhancing accessibility, and auditing third-party scripts regularly to maintain security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-s-g.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ESG positions itself as a trusted technology consulting partner for large enterprises, focusing on delivering reliable and transparent solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their commitment to integrity and minimizing client downtime. The business model revolves around consulting and technology solution deployment, targeting Fortune 1000 companies. Revenue streams likely include consulting fees and managed services. The company maintains a professional online presence with LinkedIn profiles for leadership, indicating a small but focused leadership team. Growth indicators include active blog content and event sign-ups. The partnership ecosystem includes marketing and analytics providers but no explicit strategic partners listed on the site.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. There are no signs of exposed credentials, malware, or vulnerabilities in the visible content. However, the absence of a published security policy, incident response plan, and vulnerability disclosure reduces transparency and may impact trust with security-conscious clients. Privacy compliance is limited by the lack of a cookie consent mechanism and detailed privacy disclosures. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which should be managed carefully to comply with privacy regulations. Overall, the security culture appears professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a visible cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan accessible to users.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly review and audit third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential security risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ESG
Description
Epiphany Solution Group solves business problems for the Fortune 1000 with the best technology solutions in the industry. ESG provides the right solutions with proven technology, focusing on transparency, excellent customer service, and minimizing downtime for clients.
Key services
Cloud Digital Transformation, IT Security, Network Connectivity, Data Center Solutions, SD WAN, UCaaS
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, HubSpot, Slider Revolution, WPBakery Page Builder, W3 Total Cache, LazyLoad
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Anonymize IP in Google Analytics
  • Use of security headers

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
HubSpot, LinkedIn Insight, Facebook Pixel, ZoomInfo
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. Clear focus on technology consulting for enterprise clients.
  3. Contact information is prominently displayed and includes multiple channels.
  4. No visible security or malware issues detected.
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism and detailed privacy compliance features.
  6. No published security or incident response policies found.
  7. Use of multiple third-party marketing and analytics tools.
  8. No suspicious or malicious external domains detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform with a modern tech stack including WPBakery Page Builder and Slider Revolution for content management and presentation. It uses jQuery and various JavaScript libraries for interactivity and animations. Performance is moderate with lazy loading implemented for images. SEO is well addressed with Yoast SEO plugin metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage schema. The site is mobile optimized and uses Google Fonts for typography. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses multiple third-party marketing and analytics services. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-s-g.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-s-g.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.